Bath attack, Biden Meat Puppet Administration, Defund the police, gun free school zone signs, Parkland FL, Sandy Hook, Sante Fe Texas, school attacks, school resource officers, SWAT, terrorist watch list, terrorists, the fog of battle, Uvalde TX
To find the first eight articles in this series, enter “school attacks 2022” in the SMM home page search bar.
When I originally wrote and posted this article, the last of the series, in March of 2012, I had no idea the representative scenario I wrote would so closely follow the reality of the Newtown, Connecticut—Sandy Hook Elementary–attack. However, my relative accuracy was not due to clairvoyance, nor was it mere chance. The known motivations of school shooters and the physical realities of school buildings and police response made it very likely my fictional scenario would parallel reality.
THE WORST CASE SCENARIO:
Regardless of how one feels about the foreign policy of a given presidential administration, America has been embroiled in a war with terrorists—actual terrorists, not the domestic political enemies of D/S/C administrations–since at least the Carter administration. Nearly 800 Americans were killed around the world by terrorists before 9-11, and 13 American soldiers were added in the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan. It was only 9-11 that made some realize it might be wise to act as though we were fighting a war against those who not only had long since publicly declared war on us, but had for many years been killing Americans when and wherever possible. Benghazi, and the multiple terrorist attacks—by foreign and domestic actors–that have followed in Europe and America, are continuing battles in that civilizational war.
We also know our terrorist enemies plan to carry out attacks in American schools. The FBI has reluctantly admitted to active terror investigations in all 50 states. The Biden Meat Puppet Administration has been forced to grudgingly admit as of late August, 2022, at least 81 people on the terrorist watch list have been intercepted at the southern border. These are virulent enemies of Americans and civilization from around the world, including Islamist dominated countries. God only knows how many have entered America undetected. Terrorists and criminals have always tried, with at least some success, to enter America, but thanks to the Biden Administration, a trickle has become a flood for at least two years. Knowing Biden’s handlers, those intercepted have probably been released on their own recognizance.
Terrorists have elsewhere used the tactic of attacking schools–old hat for them but new to us–for decades. It is equally sobering to realize that our own domestic brand of pseudo-terrorist, juvenile or adult, has always been present, a fact now very much in the forefront of the awareness of the residents of Newtown, CT, Parkland, FL, Sante Fe, TX most recently, Uvalde, TX and elsewhere. The most deadly terrorist attack on a school, carried out exclusively with explosives, remains the Bath attack of 1927. School attacks are nothing new.
The arming of school staff is not a panacea. It cannot replace competent, practical identification and intervention programs–which include intelligent, aware teachers simply keeping their eyes and ears open–which might help to prevent–or interdict–some school shootings before they begin, though this kind of vigilance has not stopped the most deadly and media celebrated attacks to date. I write “might” because attacks carried out by single actors, or ideologically dedicated groups, are fiendishly difficult—mostly impossible–to detect and intercept. Arming willing staff is, rather, a very low or no cost protective measure for worst-case scenarios that has the great benefit, if properly publicized, and maintained of providing credible deterrence.
Arming willing staff is like providing fire extinguishers. Most teachers will complete an entire career without needing a fire extinguisher, but when they need one, they need it immediately, badly, and nothing else will do. So it is with firearms.
I’m about to provide a scenario based on reality. I have been there and done that, in the classroom and in the responding police car. A law enforcement agency in which I served as a SWAT officer actually responded to a juvenile shooter in a large high school. In that case, the police—as is almost always true–had no real effect, despite actually being on site in the building and being—at one point–in range to engage the shooter, who actually fired at them. The officers ducked and took cover and the shooter retreated back into a classroom.
In virtually every case, the police arrive too late to make any difference.
While the team was organizing and making plans (I happened to be out of town for that call-out) the absent-minded shooter became distracted by, of all things, a pizza, and put down his shotgun in the classroom where he was holding fellow students hostage. A quick thinking youngster grabbed the shotgun, ending the affair. Miraculously, no one was injured, and as in virtually every school attack, the police had no role in ending the incident, other than delivering the pizza the young terrorist demanded.
Keep in mind the following scenario posits a single, non-ideological, domestic shooter. The threat of multiple shooters, and multiple ideologically motivated shooters, is very real and increasing every day. In a situation like that, having a single armed guard, police resource officer, or a principal with a gun locked up somewhere would be woefully inadequate in deterring and in stopping an attack. Circa Fall, 2022, with school districts desperately virtue signaling, purposely removing all law enforcement presence from their schools, or having supported defunding the police, having no available officers even if they wanted one, we see an entirely new definition of “woefully inadequate.”
The scenario I propose allows generous response times for the police—faster than reality has revealed–and the actions of the killer are likewise based on real events and practical knowledge of the criminal/terrorist mind, of tactical reality, and of school design and procedures.
WARNING: This scenario is somewhat graphic and entirely realistic. The mere idea of anyone shooting helpless children in a school is profoundly upsetting, even sickening, to moral, rational people, but considering such a scenario before the fact and drawing vital lessons from it is far better than doing so in the aftermath of an actual attack.
THE SCENARIO: a single active shooter, an adult, armed only with a 12-gauge, pump-action shotgun and a .22LR semiautomatic pistol, two common, non-military firearms, enters an elementary school in small to mid-sized town USA. Unhinged over imagined grievances, he is determined to kill as many students and teachers as possible and has nearly a hundred rounds of shotgun ammunition and three spare, loaded 10-round magazines for his pistol stuffed in his pockets. He is not a highly skilled marksman, nor does he have military/tactical experience, but at close range, against unarmed children and women, that scarcely matters. He does not plan to survive the assault; he will kill himself or force the police to do it. Your eight year-old daughter is in the fourth classroom he will enter.
0830: Monday. School has been underway for only a half hour. The morning traffic crunch won’t begin to slacken for at least another hour. Average Town Elementary School is equipped with magnetic card-reading locks, but the shooter bypasses a lock and enters the school by shooting out the glass in the door—it takes only a single shotgun blast and four seconds–-and pressing the panic bar on the inside of the door. He makes his way to the first classroom in the hallway to the left of the door. His choice of this hallway is random. He simply decides to go left rather than right, a choice that in this case will spare the lives of the students and teachers in the hallways to the right of the door.
He knows the school has no resource officer. The removal of all police officers from every school has been prominently featured in many local news stories, and the Superintendent of Schools, and President of the School Board have bragged about how teachers and children can thereby “feel safe.” Prominently posted gun-free school zone signs have also been encouraging.
NOTE: As you’ve learned from the first eight articles in this series, even schools that have resource officers, particularly elementary schools, share them with several other schools. They’re present in each school only a day or two a week, and in many cases, only for an hour or so. It would take little intelligence or surveillance to determine when that officer would and would not be present. Even an unaware attacker showing up randomly would be likely to find none present.
0832: The first gunshots ring out, causing confusion, but not instant panic. The teachers and students in most classrooms can’t hear them. Those that do–-gunshots don’t sound like they do in movies–-have to wonder “what are those noises?” Is the sixth grade studying the Civil War again? Is someone watching a movie? Did someone drop something heavy? Are the custodians making noise repairing something again?
0835: A nearby teacher finally realizes what is happening, and horrified by a glimpse of the shooter and what he is doing in that first classroom, frantically tries to call 9-11 on her cell phone. Cellular coverage in that part of the building is poor (all too common), and she is unable to make contact. Hysterically weeping and in a panic, she begins the 200 yard dash to the office.
0837: A call finally goes out from the school office to the police. They relay the room number and the name of the teacher occupying the room where the panicked teacher saw the shooter, but this information means nothing to the responding officers who have no idea how the school is laid out. None of them have ever been inside the building. For the last several years, they’ve been unwelcome. Even if they had, it’s unlikely they’d remember much about one of many schools in their community; all have different floor plans. It takes the dispatcher 15 precious seconds to clarify the room is in the east side of the building. That has some meaning to the officers, but narrows it down only to four separate hallways—there are more–each containing at least six classrooms–24 possibilities.
The shooter has reloaded and is entering the next classroom in line. The door is locked, but a buckshot round makes short work of the inexpensive lock, as with every randomly locked door he encounters. He spent five minutes in the first classroom. Twelve children and the teacher are dead. Seven more are wounded and two will die within the week. Miraculously, the shooter overlooked two children who happened to fall under the bodies of their not-so-fortunate classmates. His bloodlust is overpowering; any inhibitions he had against killing children have melted away. He is now faster and more efficient.
0838: The killer has been in the building only about seven minutes. The call goes out to officers patrolling the city. Only four are on duty; the force is 25% undermanned. “Defund the police” budget cuts and a lack of support from city “leaders” have taken their inevitable toll, and 12 more were lost only a week earlier when they refused to obey a vaccine mandate. They’re at home, suspended, awaiting firing. Weekday morning call volume is light. One is handling a life-threatening emergency and cannot get away. Of the remaining three, the nearest officer is three minutes from the school. Another is five minutes away, the third, at least six minutes away. Various administrative and investigative officers eventually get the word and hastily rush to respond from their centrally located police headquarters. Several have to take their personal vehicles, which have no lights or sirens. They will take much longer to arrive, which is the case with the two available sheriff’s deputies and the single available highway patrolman who rush to the school from many miles away, fighting early morning traffic all the way.
0841: Only 11 minutes have elapsed since the killer shot out that first pane of glass to enter the school. The shooter has finished with the second classroom. This time he was more methodical and everyone in the classroom is dead or dying. All of their “run and hide” training meant nothing, and the children were too small and terrified to even imagine trying to attack the shooter.
Teachers were issued buckets of small rocks at the beginning of the school year. In such cases, they were supposed to hand them out to students who would throw them at an armed attacker. There was no time, and the children were too small and weak to do damage in any case.
He is reloading on his way to the next classroom in line. The young female principal, shaking with fear, bravely approaches the domestic terrorist (DT) in the hallway and tries to reason with him. The first officer arrives, and feeling very lonely and exposed, sprints toward the east side of the school. Spotting the broken door glass, he enters and pauses, listening. He hears nothing for several seconds until a single gunshot rings out, followed by several long seconds of silence. It echoes through the tiled halls and concrete block walls, making it hard to determine direction. Room numbers are on small signs above each classroom door, but he cannot see them unless he is actually in a given hallway and very near each door. The hallways are long and empty, providing no cover or concealment. If the shooter sees him before he sees the shooter, he’s in real trouble. He tries to slow his racing heart and labored breathing and desperately listens, hoping to orient himself as quickly as possible.
0842: The officer again hears gunfire as the shooter enters the third classroom. He draws his handgun and moves, quickly and carefully, in the general direction of continuous, muted gunfire, but is unfamiliar with the building and makes several wrong turns, losing precious seconds. He has to wait for additional gunshots to reorient. He knows each shot means more wounded or dead kids. He knows he must act immediately, but he knows if he blunders into the shooter unprepared, he will do no good at all and will probably end up getting killed. He has to know where the shooter is before he commits to action. He hears what sounds like shotgun…and handgun fire? Could there be more than one shooter? This makes him more cautious and slower, only a little slower, but every second matters. He stops to radio the possibility of multiple shooters, and to ensure he is heard and understood (the structural steel of the building makes radio signals weak and intermittent), before he continues.
0844: Two other officers arrive and radio the first officer, who pauses to radio directions. They hurry toward him as he moves toward where he believes the shooter to be. The directions help, but they’re still unsure. The killer has finished shooting and reloads his shotgun and handgun. Only the teacher and two first grade students, all badly wounded–-one little girl will lose an arm–-will survive in the classroom he is about to leave. He steps into the hallway and seeing the officer, who is kneeling over the bloody body of the principal, trying to find a pulse, takes several shots. The first buckshot round, hastily fired, misses, shattering a trophy display case in a deluge of glass, wood and plastic. The second strikes the officer’s bullet resistant vest, which stops most of the pellets, but several penetrate his shooting arm, numbing it and causing him to drop his handgun just as he is about to fire. Falling to his backside and in shock, feeling as though he is trying to swim through molasses, he struggles to pick up his handgun with his left hand, but is too late to engage the killer who enters a fourth classroom. He knows his time is running out. Less than three minutes have elapsed from the moment the first officer entered the building until his encounter with the killer.
0845: Fifteen minutes into the incident, four minutes past the arrival of the first officer. The two additional officers arrive and drag their wounded partner, still struggling to raise and fire his handgun, down the hallway, out of the line of fire, just in time to see the killer enter the fourth classroom where your daughter, like the other children, is trying to hide behind a frightened but courageous young female teacher who will be the first to be shot. She will live, but will lose a kidney, and will suffer from severe pain for the rest of her shortened life. Many of her students will not be so fortunate.
The officers do not have time to fire a single round before they hear multiple rapid gunshots echo from the classroom down the hall. They hear what sound like four or five shotgun rounds, then pistol shots. The shooter knows he has little time left, and emptying his shotgun, has dropped it and is now using his handgun. Leaving their wounded comrade, the two backup officers leap over the body of the dead principal and rush toward the open door of the classroom, gunshots echoing in their ears…
What happened?! Did the officers corner the killer in the classroom and prevent further deaths (other than those already littering the classroom floor)? Did the killer shoot himself, or was he shot by the officers? Did your daughter survive?
But it wouldn’t happen like that! The police would surely be there much more quickly and would know exactly where to go and what to do. Perhaps a single officer, in the finest martial arts movie hero style, would disarm the suspect without firing a shot, beating him mercilessly for daring to threaten children, for not heeding the good intentions of the gun free school zone message, preventing a single injury…
Unfortunately, the time frames I’ve suggested here for police response are generous; any honest police officer will confirm that. Remember the first police officer responding to the Newtown attack did not enter the building until about 15 minutes after the radio call went out, and that radio call did not go out until about 5 minutes after the attack actually began. From the time the killer shot his way into the school until he shot himself, leaving 26 dead in his wake, the shooter took only five minutes. Someone died—on average–every 11.5 seconds.
At Parkland, the first police officers didn’t enter the building where the attack had taken place–it’s a 13-building campus–until 5:32 after the killer abandoned his weapon and fled, and 11:04 after he fired the first shot. Officers were present outside the building during the actual attack, but because the school’s security video was on a 20 minute delay(?!)—they didn’t know that—and other fog of battle factors, had no effect on the outcome of the attack. Some 27 minutes after the attack began, they were told the shooter was on the second floor and rushed there. He had been gone—out of the building; he just walked out with evacuating students–for more than 20 minutes.
At Uvalde, the police were actually in a position to end the attack within a few minutes, but retreated and did not stop the killer for 77 minutes, despite the presence of around 376 officers from multiple agencies and more then enough armor and other equipment to do the job.
This does not reflect badly on the police—we hope Uvalde is a bizarre and never again repeated anomaly–but is merely a reflection of the realities of time, distance, traffic and the fog of battle. The police did not enter the building at Columbine for hours. If that time were reduced by 50% would it be fast enough, considering the killer is on his way to your daughter’s classroom? Would a 70% reduction comfort you? In Pearl, Mississippi, at the Appalachian Law School, at Virginia Tech, at Newtown, at Parkland, the police had no active role in stopping the killers. At Uvalde, they did, but even then, they waited so long it’s a virtual certainty some who would otherwise have lived were shot, bled out and died. This has been true for virtually all school attacks. Even if the killer fires only five rounds in each classroom, would you be satisfied? Would you consider the odds to be in your daughter’s favor?
Remember that in this case, there was a single, domestic killer–not a dedicated terrorist or terrorists–armed only with two common, unremarkable firearms, firearms even Joe Biden and his handlers might allow us—for a time. Imagine the consequences if there were multiple killers, dedicated terrorists all, with more effective weapons, even explosives. Imagine that one or more were detailed to hold off the police as they arrive, giving their fellows more time to kill (go here for just that kind of scenario). Would the police response be more, or less effective under these circumstances? How much greater would be the death toll?
But doesn’t this scenario demonstrate the necessity of disarming everyone? On October 24, 2017, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a law prohibiting any firearms in schools. Prior to that law, school officials had some discretion in arming staff, though few did. State legislator Kevin McCarty (D, Sacramento) celebrated:
A safe learning environment is essential for our children to be successful in the classroom,’ McCarty said. ‘That’s not possible if a school district allows armed civilians to roam California school campuses.
“A safe learning environment.” Let’s assume we can wave a magic wand and roll firearm technology back before the invention of gunpowder. During the Medieval period–and millennia before–thousands were killed in a single day in battles, killed with the kinds of weapons we would consider crude. Yet those same weapons are readily available today, and even if they weren’t, are easier to make than most firearms.
Honest citizens are not now, nor have they ever been, the problem. They obey the law; they have no desire to harm anyone. Disarming ourselves in the face of those who will not obey the law and who want to harm us is unspeakably foolish and dangerous.
The problem, in 500 AD and now, is not tools but human nature. Evil existed then; evil exists now. We’ve seen its face in photographs of the Tucson shooter, the Colorado theater shooter and the Newtown, Parkland and Uvalde shooters. Assemblyman McCarty and his Democrat/Socialist/Communist colleagues have succeeded only in making California schools more inviting targets for demons that can now be sure no one is armed to oppose them. McCarty has established not a safe learning environment, but a safe shooting environment–-a free fire zone–-for killers.
Would you want willing teachers, trained and prepared, to be armed and able to protect your daughter, to have the opportunity, then and there, to stop the attack, or would you be satisfied with the non-violent, peaceful, safe-feeling and comforting message delivered by a few small metal signs, and the protection provided by a flimsy door, secured by a lock provided by the lowest bidder and a 3/4” thick particle board desktop? The odds, thankfully, are probably in your favor, but some people always run afoul of the odds, and there is no reason that “some people” cannot include your children.
If you would honestly choose the message and the signs, then by all means, live your convictions and post a conspicuous “WE ARE COMPLETELY UNARMED” sign on your front lawn. That’s what gun free school zone signs are. If you honestly wouldn’t do that, perhaps it’s time to join the ranks of those who recognize times have changed, and a kind of danger unique in American history faces us. Perhaps it’s time to recognize this danger can and must be addressed. There is only one, low or no cost, way to deter school attackers and to stop them when and where they attack.
Concealed handguns, carried by the willing and law-abiding, save lives, in and out of school.