Tags
illegal immigrants, Immigration, Molly Tibbetts, murder, secure borders, situational awareness, sociopaths, tactical thinking
As I’m sure most readers know, 20 year-old Mollie Tibbets of Iowa was murdered. Her body was found in a cornfield, and her killer has been arrested, and has mostly confessed, likely sufficiently to obtain a conviction. Surely, there is supporting physical evidence. The New York Post reports:
An ’llegal alien’ is in custody for the murder of Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts, according to police officials.
Cristhian Rivera, 24, was charged Tuesday in Poweshiek County after being brought in without incident by local cops.
Investigators spoke to him at length about what happened on July 18 — when he allegedly abducted Tibbetts — and revealed what he said during an afternoon press conference.
According to officials, Rivera told cops that he saw the young woman running, circled around a few times in his car, and eventually approached her.
He got out and ran up behind Tibbetts and accidentally spooked her — causing the 20-year-old to panic, officials said.
Rivera told cops that he then blacked out, and didn’t come to again until after Tibbetts was already dead — at the intersection in rural Poweshiek County where investigators found her body.
Apparently, Rivera has also said he carried her some distance in his trunk, stopped, threw her body over his shoulder, walked into a cornfield, lay her face up, and covered her with corn stalks. He led the police to her.
An initial medical examiner’s report indicates she was killed by ”sharp force trauma.” In other words, it seems likely she was stabbed to death. If we do not eventually learn she had been raped, I will be very surprised indeed. I addressed at least a few of the issues this case raises in A Losing Bet For Any Woman.
However, there are other vital issues we, gentle readers, should discuss. They are: Immigration, tactical thinking, and situational awareness, issues of importance to normal Americans–I do not include the self-imagined elite in that category–of either gender. For the sake of argument, and in deference to biology, we will assume there are yet only two, regardless of how some confused soul chooses to “identify” today. Regarding immigration, let us visit the indispensable Kurt Schlichter:
If you’re cool with Americans being butchered by illegal aliens, this November you should vote Democrat. They’re certainly cool with Americans being butchered by illegal aliens. Oh, in theory they would probably prefer that the foreigners sneaking into our country in defiance of the laws we American citizens made through our elected representatives would stop butchering Americans. They don’t particularly wantyour kids to be butchered. They just want uncontrolled illegal immigrationmore than your kids’ safety. So, they’ve made a choice to be the party of illegal immigration. And the resulting body count is a price Democrats are willing to pay to replace an electorate of Normal Americans who refuse to obey.
The Democrats are the party of No Borders, of Abolish ICE, and of murdered Americans. You cannot howl and shriek in support of X yet deny that you accept the foreseeable, demonstrated consequences of X.
Now we know Mollie Tibbetts was murdered by an illegal alien. Add her name to the butcher’s bill. And who was shocked? Who said, ‘Gosh, that’s surprising!’ Who said, ‘Whoa, I don’t believe it!’
No one. Because it happens all the time. Her life, like the lives of so many others, was snuffed out because our elite made a conscious choice to risk our lives to satisfy its own interests. She was just more collateral damage. We better decide in November where we stand, because a Democrat majority means this bloodbath continues.
In other words, if Rivera, who has lived illegally in American for from four to seven years, was never allowed to enter America, Mollie Tibbetts would still be alive; he would not have had the opportunity to kill her.
You’re a nativist, a racist, every kind of “ist!” That’s a false argument; you’re just trying to distract from the real issue, which is (add your favorite “real” issue here).
The real issue is an illegal immigrant, someone who should never have been able to enter and remain in America, murdered (allegedly: we’ll assume that modifier for the rest of the article) Mollie Tibbetts. This is fact, and no amount of name-calling will change it. It argues for a wall, effective legislation we actually intend to enforce, and every other measure that will stop illegal immigration. There is no other rational conclusion, and Schlichter is right: Democrats care much more about unrestrained illegal immigration–their future voters–than about the lives of Americans like Mollie.
I am now about to be accused of blaming the victim, so if that’s a favorite narrative, go ahead and get it out of the way. Tibbitts apparently did not engage in tactical thinking. She placed herself, alone and unarmed, in an isolated area where she had nowhere to escape, and no one to help her.
You’re blaming the victim!
Not at all. Were I engaging in that, I’d say she was asking for it because she was alone in an isolated area, and wearing a scanty little running outfit. There is only one person responsible for her death: Rivera. If he is convicted, he should be executed and only then deported. Let whatever country he claims dispose of the remains. Tibbetts should have been able to run anywhere, alone and unarmed, and remain unmolested, but that’s not tactical thinking either. More on this shortly.
According to the killer’s confession, Mollie did not see him coming, and displaying her cell phone, threatened to call the police. We will never know precisely what she was doing before he approached her, but if she is like most female runner’s I’ve seen, she was blissfully unaware of her surroundings, she had no situational awareness. Whenever I see a female runner, gliding along, staring fixedly at the ground a few yards in front of her, I want to tell her to look around, to be aware of her surroundings. This is particularly so if she’s wearing earbuds, and couldn’t hear an attacker approach if she wanted to.
But I will not live in fear! I will run wherever I wish, and I will not carry a gun. I will not become paranoid!
One need never be paranoid, but one does need to recognize reality. A woman should be able to walk, stark naked, in the unlit alley behind the sleaziest bar in town at closing time and remain unmolested. Should be. But here we see the difference between theory and rhetoric, progressive narrative and hard, cold reality. We see the difference between recognition of human nature, and willful ignorance of it. Any woman doing that is likely to be raped and worse, and thankfully, few women are so unrealistic as to try that social justice experiment.
Here’s the point: tactically, Tibbetts–any woman–should understand that running alone in an isolated area, armed only with a cell phone, is inherently dangerous. They should plan–tactical thinking–to eliminate as much of the potential risk as possible. Run with friends, run in well-lit areas where one need run only a very short distance for help, or where screams for help are likely to be heard and attract immediate response. If one chooses to run alone under those conditions, recognize a cell phone is not capable of deterring or stopping an attack then and there. Carry a concealed handgun, and be proficient in its use.
But that’s not enough. One must also employ situational awareness. They must always be looking around them, identifying potential problem areas at a distance, potential threats, and reacting appropriately, potentially preventing a confrontation. In Tibbetts’ case, the killer apparently circled around her several times before leaving his car and approaching her. We don’t know if Tibbetts recognized this danger, but if she did, she apparently didn’t respond to it.
Situational awareness is not paranoia. It’s merely intelligent watchfulness. It is not psychologically debilitating. Evil exists, and it takes advantage of the weak and unaware. Compared to men, almost all women are weaker, and most human beings are unaware.
Our hypothetical woman should be able to walk naked behind that equally hypothetical bar, and Mollie Tibbets, an attractive, petite (only 5’2”) young woman, should be able to run, alone, anywhere she pleases, but human nature doesn’t well comport with “should be,” and evil delights in those that ignore it. And no, it’s not the fault of men. The overwhelming majority of men would have loved to be there to protect Mollie Tibbetts. That’s what actual men do. That’s what I would have done, but I can’t be there for everyone, even Mrs. Manor, so she employs tactical thinking, situational awareness, and carries a concealed handgun.
Fortunately, the number of sociopaths, compared to the whole population, is small, but a woman need only meet one once. They’re out there; waiting their chance. Thinking tactically and employing situational awareness saves lives.
But Mollie Tibbetts was only 20! She couldn’t buy or legally carry a concealed weapon.
Perhaps that sort of law needs to be changed. Perhaps we shouldn’t allow publicity-seeking mental adolescents that have no understanding of reality and the Constitution make law. Perhaps all 20 year-old women contemplating running alone in an isolated area should weigh whether obeying such a law is moral, wise and conducive to longevity. Am I advocating disobeying the law? No, only considering options in light of human nature and reality.
In the needless death of a lovely young woman, there are lessons aplenty. Women need not stop exercising. They need not be paranoid. But they do need to recognize reality, the reality that tells us that not everyone in the world wishes us well, and that our own choices contribute to everything that befalls us.
Progressives cry about the children of illegal immigrants temporarily separated from their arrested parents. Perhaps they could shed a tear, even contribute to secure borders–choose the lives of Americans over potential future voters–and remember Mollie Tibbets: forever separated from her family, forever a victim of an uncaring self-imagined elite, forever 20.
Sorry, Michael… you bring up the tragic murder of a young lady not to celebrate her life but rather to promote gun carrying.. and of course.. echo the illegal immigration, or more to the point.. “Americans being butchered by illegal aliens” as if it was rampant in the streets… just to promote fear to gain support.
And.. then there’s John McCain’s death. The crickets emanating from your blog and the other conservative blogs I visit are the same.
Some go by the mantra, If there’s nothing nice to say…
Yep… very true.
And.. then there’s John McCain’s death. The crickets emanating from your blog and the other conservative blogs I visit are the same.
Your selection bias isn’t his problem; I’ve seen only one or two blogs that didn’t do a “McCain is dead” piece, radio too, usually within hours of his death.
That a one-person blog who doesn’t post multiple times a day didn’t decide he had something new and interesting to say about a dead veteran and Senator doesn’t really mean much.
***********
If the lady had a gun, she might have been alive.
Why do you hate the ability of even those who are weak to effectively defend themselves so much that someone giving sound tactical advice upsets you?
It’s called context.. and political opportunism.
It’s called “bull feces,” and “assuming the conclusion.”
If this young lady had died… well, playing computer games in Florida.. Mike’s post would likely not have been made given his post was themed around the illegal immigrant with a gun “butchering” Americans as much as tidbits for female defense. I’m simply stating the context was ill-timed given the significance of McCain’s passing. There’s no requirement that Mike has to post a darn thing regarding McCain.. his blog.
You mean you want him to jump into a gun death in a gun free zone before the bodies are even cold?
And to indicate that, you complain he didn’t talk about a guy dying of brain cancer?
Are you seriously trying to compare John McCain’s death to Molly’s? Because last I checked John McCain passed away from natural causes, in his 80’s, while surrounded by family. And Molly…
I am seriously stating that the only reason he discussed Molly is because an illegal immigrant killed her.
Dear Doug:
I know you haven’t been reading this scruffy little blog long, or at least not commenting long, but even a cursory review of the “Firearms” archive will reveal I routinely cover deaths such as Tibbetts’ when there are important lessons to be had. I do this because I care deeply about women, and feel an obligation to do what I can to protect them and help them protect themselves. Illegal immigrants have no bearing on this. I occasionally deal with illegal immigration because I support the rule of law, not politically convenient social justice, again, nothing more. We should never write a law we are not willing to enforce, and we should enforce the laws we write.
One might argue, and I would agree with you, laws are there and if they were enforced that would make a difference.. so why build a wall when all we have to do is enforce the laws on the books? We certainly need to enforce violations in overstaying a visa, which is apparently the greater problem.
Ok.. fair enough on wanting to protect women… and it happened to be coincidence her killer was an illegal (although your quoted text seemed to suggest someone was using her death to support a political issue as well). I wasn’t looking for anything about McCain.. just was a but incensed in the context and contrast of your post… and the timing with current events.
I respect your opinion, but I also hope you consider this from another perspective…My son goes to the University of IOWA (he returned after his wife finished grad school). He didn’t know Molly but he had a class with her last year.
My sons wife works at the law school and also runs. She had someone following her last June and she was freaked enough to call my son who was here in NC when that happened.
I didn’t think about these issues when I first heard what happened to Molly, but Mike brings up some important points about illegal immigration and runners carrying protection. I want my daughter in law carrying when she runs. So I am going to talk to her about this issue, and offer to get her the weapon of her choice for Christmas, if she will get all of the proper permits. If she refuses to carry a gun, maybe she will at least consider a taser. You never know, this one article may save someone’s life.
As far as the immigration issue goes, If this was an illegal immigrant,and we had enforced immigration laws, Molly would still be alive. Building a wall lets potential illegals know we are serious about how you must come in our country. And we are more likely to enforce those laws. If she had been carrying, she could have shot him. RIP Molly.
I think we are confused with the function of the wall and the ability of those protecting our borders. We don’t have the man power to protect every mile of the most border, and arrest all people coming across regardless of the law. The wall minimize the number of people coming across the border, not prevent it. Thus giving law enforcement more ability to utilize the law against the ones they catch. It’s not one or the other.
From living in El Paso– a major benefit of the law isn’t that it stops people, it’s that it makes them slow, and unable to carry heavy loads.
You can look up the crime drops after they put up the wall in El Paso– and I’ve spoken to enough of the folks who work on border security to find out a major issue is that drugs in bulk weigh a lot.
You make it even mildly obnoxious to get drugs through, say on the back of half-starved teens* who were trafficked from south America, and profits are REALLY hurt for Cartels, which will also raise trafficking costs for illegals.
I’d love to follow the money on this….
*they have backpacks sized for young children, too. But young kids would have an even harder time of crossing it.
Thank you for the detailed explanation. God Bless.
Dear Foxfier:
Quite so. Walls do work, and for many reasons.
Dear Doug:
Oh good grief. I bring up her murder in the hope that no other woman will be murdered, whether by an illegal immigrant or otherwise. Were she killed by an American, I would not have mentioned the illegal immigrant issue, but the article would have otherwise been the same. Surely you read the article? You read that I am not provoking paranoia or fear, but rather, reason and planning based on reality.
John McCain’s death has nothing whatever to do with hers. Nothing. There is no correlation, no obligation to write about both or ignore both. I wrote about McCain in May–https://statelymcdanielmanor.wordpress.com/2018/05/11/john-mccain-cruel-regrets/–and considering everything that has been written about him in the last two days, realized I had nothing to add, no unique perspective other than what I already wrote.
I am not a news source. I do not cover everything, and no one should draw any conclusions, political or personal if I do not cover any issue or story someone might like to see. As a constitutionalist, not a Republican, I likewise have no obligation to be a stereotypical political mouthpiece.
I am not sure how McCain’s death is even relevant in this context, very confused by the context. I thought this article was about illegal immigration and what young woman could do you minimize danger when alone, running or not.
Dear ChristDisciple:
As I recall, the issue was raised by a reader to point out I can’t be expected to cover everything the media might consider newsworthy, nor do I try.
Ok. Still don’t see how it got snuck in because you were talking about something not even close to relating to McCain. Thanks for the reply. GOD BLESS
I re-blogged your last article and will this one as well. Thanks.
Dear FanGirl:
My thanks!
Pingback: Molly Tibbetts: Forever 20 — Stately McDaniel Manor | pallyoop
Back when I was in the Navy, I really, really needed to be alone. One of the ways I got that was to take long walks on base, alone, after dark, listening to music. (Much later I found that “Ellipticals” can work roughly as well, if there aren’t people constantly trying to talk to you or otherwise interacting.)
I always had several mechanical pencils chosen specifically for a strong handle and a lead guider that could draw blood. Basically, a ghetto stiletto. Came up with it because I’ve got several scars on my hand from digging for my pencils in my bag.
Pretty much the entire time, it was in my hand; if something really triggered my attention, and I couldn’t just avoid it, I’d have my pocketknife in one hand to slash, and the pencil in the other to stab.
I wouldn’t be able to kill anyone, most likely, but it would hurt, and I have a good idea of “places you don’t want to get hit with something sharp.” (the pulse area of your neck, the inside of your elbow, the inside of your thigh……)
Accidentally hurt a few folks– not seriously– who thought it would be freaking HILARIOUS to jump out and grab a woman walking alone.
Elbow to the gut hurts, but also gives time to evaluate if they need to die, or as close as you can manage.
How very sad that even in the most bucolic of places, the heartland of America amid the farm fields and corn stalks, no one is immune from evil.
According to the EZnAccess Supplementary Homicide Reports website, only about 100 women of reproductive age are murdered each year by someone other than a current or former, husband or boyfriend.
The little town of Dayton Oregon seems to have become a dumping ground for murdered mothers. The body of Meighan Cordie who disapeared after attending a wedding was recently found along a highway. She had gotten into an argument with her mother after attending a wedding on Grand Island a ran off without her shoes or cell phone. It is difficult to believe that she walked 8 miles in the dark on an asphault country road that was hot as a frying pan. The coroner determined that she died from “blunt force trauma.” They are not quite ready to declare her death a murder.
Ms Cordie’s body was found less than half a mile away from a blueberry field where the body of another murdered mother was found 2 years ago. The local journalists seem to be averse to mentioning this highly unlikely congruence of homicides. The possibility that Yamhill County Oregon with a population of only 100,000 people isno doubt discomforting to them.
For what years?
I just looked up 2015, and for women from 15 to 49 there were 410 family, 900 acquaintance, 95 stranger and 717 unknown offender.
Family and acquaintance would cover exes of various flavors, but most stranger murders wouldn’t be solved. (at least not quickly)
https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezashr/
************
Given the county, there’s a chance that the homicides are cartel related.
I know it’s not supposed to matter, but after looking at some of her pictures and videos, Molly Tibbets seems to be the woman who never didn’t smile, and this murder makes me even sadder and angrier than usual. My daughter lived in a tiny town about 50 miles from Brooklyn, which helps the imagination go to bad places. And my daughter’s a teacher, too, so she’s foremost in my mind when reading many of your posts.
Dear ttl:
May the Lord bless and keep her, and please give her my regards for her service.
Pingback: Mollie Tibbetts: Forever 20, Coda | Stately McDaniel Manor