Tags
Amanda Gailey, American constitutionalism, Kurt Schlichter, Mao Zedong, marxism, Mike Huckabee, Patricia Hill, President Trump, Progressivism, Sarah Sanders, the age of Obama, The Red Hen, They won't like the new rules
In 2015, the indispensable Kurt Schlichter wrote:
Today in America, a despised minority that is really no minority is the target of an establishment that considers this minority unworthy of respect, unworthy of rights, and unworthy of having a say in the direction of this country. It’s an establishment that has one law for itself, and another for its enemies. It’s an establishment that inflicts an ever-increasing series of petty humiliations on its opponents and considers this all hilarious.
That’s a recipe for disaster. You cannot expect to change the status quo for yourself and then expect those you victimize not to play by the new rules you have created. You cannot expect to be able to discard the rule of law in favor of the rule of force and have those you target not respond in kind.
This was during the final years of the Age of Obama,a golden progressive age Democrats thought would never end–could never end–so progressives doubled down on Marxism and put all their chips on a spin of the political roulette wheel for Hillary Clinton (to save you the trouble, gentle readers, I’ve already called the metaphor police and reported myself). Progressivism was our inevitable, preordained destiny, the bending of the arc of history toward social justice. Hillary could not lose,and when she was proclaimed the new progressive messiah, the long march toward Marxism and all its glories would be unstoppable.
And then–TRUMP.
The minority about which Schlicter was speaking were normal Americans, republicans, conservatives, anyone that had not quaffed the entire bathtub of progressive Kool-aid. Then as now, the members of that deplorable flyover country minority were evil, sexist, racist, haters, Nazis, Hitlers, people who want everyone to have fully semiautomatic assault weapons with gigantic capacity magazines to kill children, when they aren’t ripping them from the arms of their parents and locking them in cages. Oh, and they’re all God clingers too, every one, and worst of all, they won’t bake cakes for gay couples and expect trans people, or whatever they consider themselves these days, to pee in restrooms reflecting the gender into which they were born. Those deplorable are peeists too!
Now fully in the grip of Trump Derangement Syndrome, progressives find deplorables devoid of humanity, lower than beasts. Because Trump is the embodiment of evil, everyone in any way associated with him, even by casting a vote for him, is also evil, and must be suppressed. There are no longer any social conventions, no basic decency, no kindergarten level politeness owed them. They may be abused, insulted and beaten. Their property may be destroyed. They and their families may be pursued to their homes and harassed at will. They are evil, and the self-righteous must give evil no quarter.
Recently, in President Trump: Child Abusing Immigration Hitler Nazi? I wrote about congressmen and congresswomen, and a congressional intern, boorishly, even obscenely, harassing President Trump–in the halls of Congress. I also wrote about Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen forced to flee a Washington DC restaurant after being viciously harassed by “Democrat Socialist” activists who trespassed and committed a clear breach of the peace. Among their number was a paralegal employee of The Department of Justice. Another group–presumably of the same organization–showed up at Nielsen’s home and conducted a crude, angry demonstration.
As Fox News reports, the deterioration of adult, civilized conduct continues apace:
White House Press Secretary Sanders was thrown out of a Virginia restaurant on Friday because she works for President Trump — the latest Trump official to be hounded out of a restaurant because of their political affiliation.
TMZ reported that she was kicked out of the restaurant — The Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia — on ‘moral grounds’ and cited a waiter who said that Sanders was served ‘for a total of two minutes before my owner kicked her out along with seven of her other family members.’
Sanders confirmed the events on Twitter, saying she was told to leave by the owner because she worked for the president.
Fortunately, civilized people were not impressed:
Everyone should boycott this restaurant. Put them out of business. Asking a paying patron to leave because she’s a Republican is repulsive,’ one Yelp review said.
Of course, some were in favor of abusing people because of their political affiliations or jobs:
While the new “reviews” were overwhelmingly negative, the restaurant did get some backing from Trump opponents — with one saying Red Hen’s decision was “truly awesome.’
‘If some can refuse service to gay’s [sic] then YES others can for immoral lying to American people through WH Press Conferences,’ a five-star review said on Facebook.
No one is refusing service to gays. This is an apparent reference to the Master Piece Cake Shop case, where the owner would not make a very specific cake in support of a gay marriage. He did not refuse to serve the gay couple, nor did he kick them out of his shop. He did not denigrate them or their sexual/political choices, and offered to sell them anything else in his shop, but his religious convictions would not allow him to do as they asked. There is simply no comparison. Sanders was denied service and actually thrown out of a restaurant because she works for President Trump. There was no First Amendment issue. In fact, one can reasonably argue the owner of the Red Hen–one Stephanie Wilkinson–was infringing on Sanders’ First Amendment rights. Sanders does not make policy, nor does she carry it out, she merely keeps the press, and the American people, informed, and suffers daily abuse from a ravening, barely civilized press corps in the process.
It should not be surprising that Wilkinson was not satisfied with ousting Sanders and her family. Sanders went home, but her remaining party went to a restaurant across the street. Wilkinson followed them–people who do not work for Mr. Trump–and continued to crudely harass them. Sander’s father, Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee was not impressed:
Calls to the restaurant went to voicemail, which was full. The controversy sparked a panicked tweet from the (unaffiliated) Red Hen in Washington, D.C., which noted that it had nothing to do with the incident.
Obviously that restaurant manager realizes it’s not good business, to say nothing of good manners–to alienate 40-50% of one’s potential customers. People go to restaurants for a bit of peace and quiet, and to eat good food, not to be harangued. Presumably, the owner of the Leftist “Red Hen” will now screen customers based on political ideology? Perhaps post “No Republicans” signs? But that’s not all, gentle readers. “Activists” were upset that Sanders dared to expose their hatred:
In other words, leftists can violate the boundaries of civilized personal and political discourse at will. They can trespass, breach the peace, engage in vandalism and violence, because conservatives, and particularly because Trump. But when conservatives dare to use progressive’s social media methods, when they dare to tell the public what progressives have done, that’s a red-faced, spittle-flinging outrage! Fortunately, not everyone agrees:
Stephanie Wilkinson, the Red Hen’s owner, engaged in an overtly political act for political purposes. Sanders replied in a calm and polite manner. Anyone engaging in politics must understand it is legitimate for others to respond to their political acts–the First Amendment and all that. But because evil deplorables are not allowed to defend themselves, this is, of course, outrageous. But shouldn’t progressives be delighted for any publicity about their juvenile, ugly protests? That’s The Resistance! Isn’t that in large part why they do such things? To widely publicize their virtue signaling?
And now, Rep. Maxine Waters, one of the most powerful, an unhinged, members of the House, is directly inciting violence:She added: “God is on our side.” Well, if that’s the case, anyone progressives hate is fair game, aren’t they? Shouldn’t the enemies of God be utterly destroyed? Why should they be suffered to live?
Nancy Pelosi, the Democrat maximum leader, really gave it to Waters, as Fox News reports:
So Water’s comments were “unacceptable,” though Pelosi didn’t mention Waters at all, but I’m sure that’s who Pelosi intended to mention, if she, and all progressives, weren’t so befuddled by Trump, who is so uncivil as to hit back twice as hard in response to progressive incivility. Republicans aren’t supposed to do that! Just ask a Never Trumper.
And how, pray tell, will we “conduct elections in a way that achieves unity”? I’m sure Ms. Pelosi means everyone will unify and vote only for Democrats, and no one will be allowed to oppose progressives or progressive policies, because that would be hate speech, and would not be unifying. See how easy it is to heal all America’s divisions?
What Ms. Pelosi refuses to recognize is unity is achieved after an election only when everyone embraces American constitutionalism. Only when everyone willingly agrees to accept the outcome of an honest election can our republic survive.
But that’s not all. Progressive mobs are working on the state and local levels too:
On Saturday, Florida Attorney General – and ardent Trump supporter – Pam Bondi was confronted by a group of protesters outside the screening of a documentary about Mister Rogers in Tampa. A video of the confrontation shows the Florida AG leaving the theater as several people yell at her, with one woman seen shouting at her about Bondi’s recent actions on health care policy and her stance on immigration.
What’s that? I’m cherry picking isolated incidents? The College Fix reports on yet another “isolated” incident. Actually, two isolated incidents:
A professor of sociology from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln was convicted of vandalizing the home of a National Rifle Association lobbyist this week, with the judge ordering her to pay $500 in fines and stay away from the home in question.
Patricia Hill, who is both a research assistant and a professor at UNL, was found guilty on Monday of smearing fake blood on the steps of NRA lobbyist Chris Cox’s Alexandria, Virginia home, The Washington Post reports.
Judge Donald M. Haddock Jr. ‘ordered [Hill] to pay a $500 fine, not contact the Cox family, and stay 500 feet away from their home,’ the newspaper reports.
Hill ‘is also under a temporary restraining order that bars her from Cox’s wife’s business and from NRA offices in Virginia and Washington, D.C.
This is common leftist behavior, but is unusual in that Hill works at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and presumably lives in or near Lincoln, Nebraska, some 1200 miles/18 hours away from Cox’s home and workplace. One might reasonably see the mere fact that Hill had to repeatedly travel half way across the nation to vandalize Cox’s home as something approaching premeditation and criminal intent. And this is not Hill’s first rodeo, after being sentenced, she was served with a warrant for another similar political vandalism incident occurring in October, 2017. Despite being caught on video and seen by a security guard, Hill says she plans to appeal her conviction, no doubt on the grounds that Cox is evil and has blood on his hands because children, and especially because Trump!
Lest anyone scream I am doxing poor Prof. Hill, the screenshot I’ve included in this article is from her biographical page on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln website. It’s freely accessible by the public. As a university professor, she is a public figure, and even more so when she engages in political crimes. As one might suspect, Hill has her defenders:
Amanda Gailey, a UNL professor and president of Nebraskans Against Gun Violence, questioned how ‘Cox has the nerve to cry to the courts because someone allegedly put a harmless red substance’ on his steps.
Gailey gained publicity for holding up a protest sign during the Aug. 25 episode involving a sophomore who was recruiting for the conservative Turning Point USA. Gailey also held a sign of protest last month near Cox’s residence. She wasn’t charged or disciplined for either of those activities.
Professor Gailey, who teaches English, is obviously not schooled in criminal law. Putting “a harmless red substance” on someone’s home-steps are a part of one’s home–constitutes vandalism and/or destruction of property anywhere in the nation. Gailey did not commit that crime in her personal terrorizing of Cox, his family and neighbors, so she was not arrested. Her photo, like that of Hill, is a screenshot from the UNL website.
My work and life occupy me constantly. Don’t Hill and Gailey have any real work to do, you know, like teaching? I don’t have the time to drive 18+ hours to vandalize the property of people that disagree with me. Actually, I don’t know anyone that does–or is so inclined.
Progressives, unhinged by their hatred, are unable and unwilling to accept American constitutionalism. They will not abide the results of lawful elections, nor do they support the peaceful transfer of power. They believe the only legitimate power is theirs–God is on their side–and they are crossing line after line. The social, political lines that delineate polite civil deportment allow us to hold differing political views, and to discuss them without resorting to violence. They make compromise possible. When those lines are crossed, it is difficult to step back. Those crossing the lines are emboldened, particularly if they pay no price for their trespass. Little by little, crime by crime, they feel justified in committing any act of cruelty or violence. Their political opponents are not human, after all, they’re Nazis, and Nazis must be exterminated.
Schlichter was right: progressives aren’t liking their new rules. They instituted them believing they would always be in charge and no one could deny them. And then Donald Trump began enforcing the rule of law and upholding the Constitution, and they went stark, raving mad.
They have hurt people; they crossed that line years ago. They nearly killed Rep. Steve Scalise. They are steadily working up to routine political assassination. If they do not regain political power, massive organized violence and targeted killings are all that is left to them. They’ve crossed too many lines to go back. And if they do regain political power, they’ve shown us all exactly what they intend to do with it. The First and Second Amendments will be only the first to go.
They do not accept American constitutionalism. They do not recognize the necessity of civilized discourse in maintaining our constitutional republic because they’ve transcended it. It will not allow the establishment of their worker’s utopia. They utterly reject it. If they ever regain control of Washington, they will not lose power again, and their only means of retaining it will be the methods of all Marxists: bloody, armed revolution. Resistance? We haven’t seen anything yet.
Normal Americans are patient. They are not easily provoked. They, and their forbearers, have fought to vindicate the promise of the Constitution, for domestic tranquility, and paid in blood, but there are lines no sane person dares cross. No sane man awakens that sleeping giant.
I hope I’m wrong. I hope they wake up–not become woke; that way lies madness and death–and understand in their rejection of the American way of democracy, they are demanding their own obliteration. They hate the NRA and President Trump, because the NRA and President Trump represent and defend normal Americans, the rule of law and the Constitution. They know, above all, Mao Zedong, the most prolific mass murderer in history, was right: power grows out of the barrel of a gun. What they are too hate-filled to acknowledge is normal Americans have the guns, and know how to use them. They will never surrender them, and any attempt to take them will spark civil war.
If it comes, it will be an ugly and bloody revolution, but it will be brief, and as with all civil wars, those that turned against the Constitution, against America, against liberty, will pay the ultimate price.
No, they won’t like the rules they’ve forced on everyone else.
Good post. My cousin has two sons who will be attending UNL in two months, freshman and sophomore. Next time I see her I’ll be bringing this up and asking her how comfortable she is with these types of professors employed there. Curious as to what she’ll answer.
More and more your rhetoric is containing mention of a real revolution.. or civil war. There are 325 million Americans and you’ve got us fighting each other in the streets simply from gauging dissent from an outspoken few? Why would “progressives” even want to fight a civil war when “conservatives” are alleged to have all the guns.. ready to use for just such an occasion?
I have no doubt that this business could get far “stickier” as time goes on.. with maybe some nutcases on both sides willing at some future breaking point to express their discontent with their trigger fingers in random violence. But I would be far more concerned with trying to use some other kind of constructive rhetoric before things get too carried away.
Let’s put it this way.. if there’s a shooting war out of all this, no one will win… and I mean no one… and there will be no going back.
James Hodgkinson didn’t wait for “some future breaking point” to express his discontent with his trigger finger. Also the “outspoken few” AntiFa thugs in Portland, Oakland and elsewhere have already taken their fight against anyone they disagree with to the streets. Mike’s point is that the Radical Left is rapidly approaching the point where normal social norms no longer apply.
Dear Bucky Barkingham:
Quite so. And as those norms are pushed more and more, normal Americans will lose patience.
One of the rare moments we agree, Mike.
Dear Doug:
Oh, I think we agree more than rarely.
Yeah.. and the far right has done their share of violence as well. Look, this should not be a pissing match, my friend. Try and step back from your smug “it’s our turn to make things truly great”Trumpian vantage point and realize that no one is going to win this if it gets worse. While your 40% is relishing having control of what you want.. you think 60% is just going to sit idely by while Trump wrecks the place? You think that 60% simply hates the Trump agenda that you love? I got some news for you… it’s Trump himself.. his methods… his whims. You might want to try separating the man from his agenda… because his agenda is not that out of line. But he most certainly is.
Doug, I’ve got bad news for you. The Nazi’s were left wingers. They agree with the communist on everything, central control of the economy, strict godlessness, gulags, gun control, etc. The only thing they disagree on was whether it was all done in the name of the working class or for the 1000 year Reich. Mussolini and Lenin were peers before WW1. They hate each other only because they are competing for the same soulless people.
See, any honest discussion of the left-right spectrum must be between total government control on the extreme left and no government on the extreme right.
Conservatives want limited government, which is somewhere to the right of center. They have nothing in common with fascists/communists/progressives, who all occupy the extreme left.
So when you say “far right has done their share of violence as well” I assume you mean the white supremacist in Charlottesville, but they had nothing to do with the pro-Trump right. They are assigned to the right by the press, in an attempt to smear Trump and his supporters, just like every time Hitler is called a right winger..
So, I’d like you to back up your statement. Please provide a list of incidents of right wing violence.
The list of left wing violence is too long for this forum, but lets just start with the recent specifically political ones, like numerous assassinations of police officers (i.e. the Dallas TX cop killer) and the congressional baseball practice shooter. Oh, and the American Civil War.
And you simply don’t understand Trump. Listen to a few Scott Adams videos if you want to start to understand. He’s the Dilbert creator and was apolitical before now. He simply observed in mid-2016 that Trump was a master persuader and predicted that he’d win. For that, he is labeled as “alt right” and has lost millions of dollars in speaking fees. Virtually all of what Trump has done has been planned out in advance. Yes, a few of the tweets were ill advised. But I didn’t vote for him to be my priest.
Phil… just as you think you’ve roped onto the Trump parade and are riding with him hard with both hands, I am not… with equal fervor. But again… this is about him and NOT his agenda.
I actually felt something from you with your last paragraph… about me not understanding Trump. I’m not being the least bit sarcastic. You are actually trying to convince me using some of the elements that apparently helped to convince you of his immense value to the nation.. ooops.. the world. (that part was sarcasm). I, too, would love to save YOU from your misguided perceptions of Trump; not your support of his agenda.
Phil.. in my entire lifetime I have NEVER elevated any politician to the level that you and his base have done on a personal level. You’re absolutely correct in that Trump can apparently convince a lot of people that he’s worth a damn. You’re spending way too much time and effort trying to debate on picayune pissng-match; I don’t give a damn about how the Nazis were in WW2.. or what Stalin did or didn’t do. I don’t care one iota about chalking up negatives to each side.. like me having to provide “proof” of right wing violence events. Geez, Phil… we are way past that petty nonsense with all this divisiveness.
It’s Trump who has divided us… continues to divide us… and is battering down our relationships domestically and around the world because of his one dimensional idea of what the world should be.
It’s all about the man himself, Phil. Just focus on that.. because all the other noise you are trying to generate to “win” some argument or justify your position in loving the man himself… is just the smoke he hopes you will generate.
So, just to be clear, you’ve got nothing to back up your claim about equivalent right wing violence. Got it. Good to know.
Sorry you’re tone deaf, Phil. You, Mike, et al, will wake up soon enough.
Dear Doug:
If you’ve never done this, give it a try; it will be very instructive: google “obama halo.” You’ll find hundreds. The editor of Newsweek said Obama was “kind of a god.” I know of no one that thinks Donald Trump a deity, or any kind of savior, though they are pleased Hillary is not president, to be sure. To whatever degree most normal Americans like Mr. Trump, it’s because he is not violating the Constitution and is restoring limited government and the rule of law.
Oh, and welcome back!
You mean.. by YOUR interpretation that Obama violated the Constitution. That’s the same interpretation that I make regarding Trump doing the same exact thing. I suppose we will know for sure following the Mueller investigation.. because anything less is simply conjecture… on both sides.
Dear Doug:
One example only: Mr. Obama said some 20 times he did not have the constitutional authority to rewrite immigration law (the “dreamers”), and then did it anyway. Even he admitted he violated the Constitution. And I could do on, and on…
This isn’t about Obama… Trump is President. This isn’t about Hillary and her 30,000 emails.. Trump is President. This isn’t about the Clinton Whitewater thing… Trump is President. This isn’t about Benghazi.. Trump is President. This isn’t even about the WW2 Nazis, Stalin, or, the Civil War.. Trump is President… not Lincoln.
Mike,
I have former colleague that suffers from Trump Derangement System. Just mentioning the name Trump makes her go into spastic convulsions. I’m not exaggerating, she absolutely goes into a fit of rage and goes all emotional.
The problem with her and people like her is that they will never see what is going on because they refuse to look. It all boils down to is someone rational or irrational.
Just remember the irrational will change or deflect the topic when they realize they have lost the argument.
Dear Doug:
I’ve not seen any normal Americans “relishing having control.” I do see people glad to see a POTUS that does not routinely violate the Constitution, or seek to destroy portions of it.
Yeah.. better to have a POTUS that lies daily to EVERY American, belittles and tarnishes America’s law enforcement and intel agencies, creates chaos for the sake of chaos, fails constantly to even attempt to unite Americans, most certainly does not defend the nation against our enemies, yada, yada. Yeah… well worth the trade off, Mike.
Doug,
You seriously need to get some help.
No, my friend… we are ALL gonna need some help.
Dear Doug:
You don’t think the DOJ and FBI are covering up, at the least, substantial unethical behavior, if not crimes?
Doug,
“I Beseech You, in the Bowels of Christ, Think it Possible You May Be Mistaken” – Oliver Cromwell
Phil.. and et al..
I’ll submit this for your perusal given this is my entire case regarding Trump. I wrote this just as he came to office, based on his campaign performance.. and it is NOT a reflection of his performance as President. My point.. in some form or another many folks like myself saw caustic behavior coming.
http://www.findingpoliticalsanity.com/why-i-dislike-this-guy-as-my-president-2/
The following is my most recent post ….
http://www.findingpoliticalsanity.com/the-civility-is-revolting/
I’m sure whoever reads this from Mike’s readership will find all this a squeaky fingernail on a chalkboard… but I simply submit this to illustrate we are passing way past the debate being just Trump’s agenda… or defending his existence by comparing who pisses into the wind more… or how many nasty events Liberals may or my not have done more than Conservatives.
Doug,
Your link states “Politicians notably make campaign promises they don’t or can’t fulfill once in office. His promises were wildly proclaimed with obvious (to anyone understanding politics) doubt on his ability to deliver.”
Trump has kept more promises than any politician in my lifetime, all in less than two years, with virtually no support from his own party. Tax cuts, regulatory roll back, Gorsuch, 3% GDP growth (actually now 4%), destroying ISIS, withdrawing for the Paris Climate and the Iran deals, trying to build the wall, rebuilding the military, rebuilding respect for the US internationally (noticed the immediate cessation of Russian jets buzzing our ships and Iranian boat harassing our ships?)…the list goes on and on.
I opposed Trump during the primary, in large part because I assumed that he was lying. But he actually meant all of it. And where he’s fallen short, it was probably a planned exaggeration based on persuasion techniques, like his statement about deporting 12 million illegals. Again, Scott Adams will explain it all to you, for free, if you can check your TDS.
You’re mad because he was right and you were wrong. Admitting to your problem is the first step to fixing it.
Phil..
In the spirit of discourse, I am at the moment listening to Adams… will let you know.
Regarding your claim of Trump’s amazing fulfilled campaign promises.. well, not so sure about that.. yet.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/
Comparing the two “pies”, Trump isn’t there.. or even close. But.. his term is not over.
Doug,
I read your links. Even Obama’s “promises kept” were actually all disasters or jokes. Improved weather prediction and ending the incandescent light bulb?!!! He kept his promise to give $2 million for Iraqi refugees but he also abandoned Iraq prematurely, for domestic political reasons, which created the vacuum into which ISIS grew.
And they should be ashamed that they gave him any credit for the VA; he treated vets with disdain.
And his program to combat the “school to prison pipeline” lead directly to the deaths of those 17 students and staff at Parkland FL. Trayvon Martin also died unnecessarily because of that same Broward County program.
Restrict warrantless wiretaps!!!! Are you @&$*^%# kidding me? We know for a fact that NSA Director Admiral Rogers, in April of 2016, discovered widespread abuse of the FISA 702 program by “contractors” and shut it down, and had to reform the program to prevent future abuse. There’s good reason to believe that the FBI was spying on US citizens since at least 2015. Maybe even spying on opposition party politicians, which would be the worst political scandal in US history.
And let’s not forget “if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor.”
Obama also promised to bring us together but did the exact opposite.
I stand by my statement that Trump has fulfilled more campaign promises, in meaningful ways, than any politician in my lifetime.
Dear Phil:
Quite so. I have yet to find a “fact checker” worthy of the name.
Dear Phil:
By any objective standard, Mr. Trump has done just that, and continues to do so.
Wooaa. That is the best spoof I’ve read in recent times. You should take over Jordan Kleppers show. To take reality and just switch the republicans for the democrats is genius! I thought you were serious there for a while. LOL. Sorry, my sides are hurting from laughing.
Recreational use of marijuana is legal in Oregon.
Super Post as always.
Remember that this all started a couple of decades ago when pro-American speakers meekly acquiesced to being prevented from speaking at college campuses.
I can’t help but think that we wouldn’t be having as much problem today if security put the first dozen or so assailants in the hospital.
It comes down to living in a bubble. Most progressives have a very limited view of the world. They know as much about flyover country as they know about Tibet. Their belief is how can anyone not want to live like them. And they tend to believe that they know what’s best for others.
During the lead up to WWII there was a great deal of discussion in Japan about the way forward. The hard liners were convinced they would prevail in a war with the United States. They were living a dream. All one had to do is look at the resources of men and material that the United States had in comparison to the Japanese and would have realized the folly of such an idea.
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto studied at Harvard and had been a naval attaché in DC. He knew what the United States was capable of doing and warned the Japanese leadership of the risks. Well the rest is history.
As Sun Tzu wrote 2500 years ago. When you back someone into a corner they will fight the most ferocious. The progressives living in their bubble constantly attacking, forcing their beliefs on others is just backing people into a corner. They don’t see what they are doing because they are in their bubble and think how anyone can not want to live or think like them.
One can only hope the progressives realize the risks sooner than later.
Pingback: Yes, yes, the left does hate America that much – The Daley Gator
Dear Doug:
Thanks!
Maybe this will work.
Dear Doug:
I think you’ve got it.
Pingback: Leftist Violence: Fighting Back | Stately McDaniel Manor
“We right-thinking people tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the lies and hatred that undermined his presidency. We tried statesmanship. Could there be another human being who so desperately prized ‘collegiality’ as John McCain? We tried propriety. Has there been a nicer human being than Mitt Romney? And the results were always the same.
“While we were playing by rules of dignity and propriety, the Left engaged in a knife fight where the only rules were those of the Chicago Mob.
” With Trump, this has come to an end. He is America’s first wartime president in the Culture War.
“During wartime, dignity and collegiality are not the most essential qualities for warriors.
“”Ulysses S. Grant was a drunk whose behavior might have gotten him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming an officer in peacetime. Had Lincoln applied peacetime rules and booted Grant, the Democrats might still own their slaves today. But Lincoln rightly recognized that ‘I can’t spare this man. He fights.'”
-Evan Sayet, Townhall.com, 11-13-17
Since you brought up my home town…
“You can get more with a kind word and a gun, than with just a kind word.” – Alphonse Capone
Dear Tom:
At one point, in response to advisors that wanted Grant fired for his drinking, Lincoln is reported to have said he would like to send barrels of whatever Grant was drinking to all his other generals.