Tags
barack obama, California, Chuck Schumer, Donald Trump, Heather MacDonald, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, Kate Steinle, Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco, Sig P239
I have just a few comments on the bizarre, but not unexpected, verdict in the Kate Steinle murder, but first, let’s turn to the indispensable Heather MacDonald for background:
Advocates for illegal immigrants are unrepentant after yesterday’s shocking acquittal on all homicide charges of an illegal-alien confessed killer. The advocates are defending the sanctuary policies that had set in motion the 2015 killing in San Francisco; they have also doubled down on their opposition to any deportation of illegal aliens, criminal or otherwise. If ever there were a clarifying moment regarding what is at stake in the battle for the immigration rule of law, this is it.
Jose Ines Garcia Zarate was a poster boy not just for the folly of sanctuary policies but also for the mass low-skilled Hispanic immigration that has transformed California. A barely literate drug dealer from Mexico with a second-grade education, no English, and a penchant for criminal aliases, Garcia Zarate had been deported five times by federal immigration authorities following convictions for various crimes.
Despite his record, Garcia Zarate was the sort of immigrant that the San Francisco authorities apparently believed that this country needs. Having completed a federal sentence in March 2015 for his sixth felonious reentry into the country, Garcia Zarate had been sent to the San Francisco County Jail to serve time for a marijuana charge from which he had absconded two decades ago. Immigration and Customs Enforcement requested that when the San Francisco sheriff released Garcia Zarate after his drug sentence, the sheriff would notify ICE so that the federal agents could pick him up for his sixth deportation. The sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, ignored the marijuana charge and, most crucially, the ICE detainer request as well, instead freeing Garcia Zarate back into San Francisco’s streets before ICE could pick him up. This release followed the city’s sanctuary policy, which forbade local law enforcement authorities from cooperating with their federal counterparts in ICE: local authorities may not notify ICE of a criminal illegal alien’s release date or hold that criminal alien for ICE to pick-up.
Four months after Mirkarimi sent Garcia Zarate back into San Francisco’s illegal alien subculture, the felon picked up a gun on the Embarcadero and fatally shot Kate Steinle, 32, in the heart. He then tossed the gun into the San Francisco Bay and ran off. The drug dealer changed his story several times during police interrogation, first saying that he had been aiming at a sea lion, then claiming that he didn’t even know that he was handling a gun. The gun had been stolen from the parked car of a federal law enforcement agent four days earlier; Garcia Zarate’s story at trial was that he had picked up a rag with the gun hidden within it and that the gun had accidentally discharged. To no avail, the prosecutor contested Garcia Zarate’s claim that the pistol used in the crime, a Sig Sauer P239, could be fired without the trigger being deliberately pulled.
While I’m not a Sig fan–they make fine firearms–a P239, absent significant damage or other mechanical fault, will not fire by itself. Such nonsense is common in anti-gun havens like the People’s Republic of California, where firearms are widely believed to possess moral agency and the ability to fire independently of human beings, or failing that, can influence otherwise peaceful people to pick them up and wreck all manner of carnage. While I am not privy to the trial transcript, I’ve heard nothing to suggest there was such a fault, but more about that shortly.
The verdict is indeed outrageous, even in a time when a mere tweet by Donald Trump provokes red-faced, spittle slinging outrage. We are nearly outraged out.
It is, however, important to understand trials are iffy propositions. Quirky juries can return the most improbable verdicts, and particularly so in jurisdictions with very clear and well-known political leanings. San Francisco and California love them some illegal alien felons. They love them so much they keep convicting them of felonies–they don’t really mean it–releasing them, and inviting them back. In Zarate’s case, six times, which was one time too many for Kate Steinle.
We do not, at the moment, know precisely why the jury acquitted Zarate of the major charges. That Steinle is dead at Zarate’s hand seems an obvious case of involuntary manslaughter, negligent homicide, or any other similarly fitting statute (see my favorite Bookworm for a discussion of an applicable statute). The results of an accident might be dented fenders, fire damage, a broken leg or a bloody nose. Shooting someone in the heart, for any reason, is an entirely different matter, but apparently not in California where the shooter is an illegal alien felon, or an undocumented accidental gun-in-a-rag disposal technician, as you will.
It is prudent not to assume too much. We were not there to hear the testimony and to see the witnesses and lawyers. All of those factors are telling, yet we are denied them all. It is entirely possible the defense outclassed the prosecution. The prosecutors may have done a terrible job, leaving the jury with no option but acquittal. The defense lawyer may have been a virtual Perry Mason, though he looks far more like a central casting defense lawyer, with long hair, a fashionably scraggly beard, and a slightly desperate, yet smug, glimmer in the eye.
We are told the defense argued Zarate was so uneducated, so stupid, he did not understand the police. No wonder he told multiple, contradictory stories! Of course, this is just the kind of person the left wants to welcome to America. We are told Steinle was hit by a ricochet, as though that somehow makes her death a completely understandable and eminently forgivable accident. Gun owners–law-abiding and safety-conscious Americans, would expect to be jailed should any projectile from their weapons unlawfully kill anyone for any reason. Apparently in California, if one is an illegal alien felon, such understandings are inapplicable.
We can analyze the bare bones of the case, the fact the gun was stolen from a federal law enforcement officer’s vehicle a few days before the shooting, from a place not far from the pier where Steinle bled out. We can surmise the most likely scenario: Zarate, a five time felon/loser, stole the gun, and for whatever reason–on purpose or carelessly–fired it. It makes little difference to Steinle and those that loved her. We can infer evidence of guilt in Zarate’s immediate disposing of the gun. Does someone involved in a car accident immediately have his vehicle shredded? We can infer guilt from Zarate’s immediate flight. We can infer guilt too, from Zarate’s multiple lies to police. But we don’t know how any of this was presented, and we know less about the members of the jury.
It is also possible the judge’s jury instructions were faulty, and while such instructions might give the defense another trial upon conviction, the prosecution gets one shot, miss or not. Perhaps this, poor prosecution, a public predisposed toward upholding the nonexistent rights of foreign felons over those of their countrymen, all combined to leave Kate Steinle just another victim of a tragic accident caused by someone who should never have been in the country. Too bad, so sad, but these things happen if we are to uphold progressive values, if we are to build the kind of country about which Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS and The New York Times can be proud.
If we believe in the rule of law, we must accept this outcome just as we felt justice done in the acquittal of George Zimmerman, or the Six Baltimore Officers insanely charged in the Freddie Gray case. To do less is to accept the central conceit of social justice: justice is what we say it is, independent of the evidence, the facts, and the law, at any given moment. As Winston Churchill said, Democracy is the worst form of government, other than all the others. The same is true of our system of justice.
That doesn’t mean we are compelled to say nothing about it. We are not prohibited from asking questions. We are not forced to think the people that made it possible for Zarate–cops, politicians, lawyers and social justice warriors–to be on that pier that day with a stolen gun in his hand, to be noble and uniquely patriotic, working for the highest American ideals. What the media will never cover, because it will never happen, is masked conservatives, normal Americans, rioting in protest of the verdict. Of that, we can be proud. That, we must preserve.
We must focus on what we can do, on what is in our power: rewriting federal immigration law to protect the citizens of the United States, to recognize the inestimable value of American citizenship, and to admit only those immigrants that are anxious to assimilate, and that will contribute to our society, that will be producers rather than takers. Public officials that have thrown in their lot with illegals over Americans, must be made to feel, every day and in every way, the fools and useful idiots they are. They must be sanctioned, even prosecuted. The laws that have allowed automatic citizenship merely by being born within our borders, regardless of the citizenship status of parents, must be changed. Chain migration must cease. Lotteries giving terrorists immigration preference must be obliterated.
The utter destruction of sanctuary cities must be a top priority. Whether by social pressure, financial sanctions, or outlawing them entirely and prosecuting and jailing those that violate those laws, or some combination of all and more, it must be done.
Standing in the way of the kinds of actual reforms that would save American lives and jobs is the entire Democrat party, everywhere, and not a few members of the Stupid Party. One thing is certain, under President Trump, we’ll likely never have a better chance to put America first, and to save American lives. The left knows that, which is why they never cease trying to disarm the law-abiding, and why they hate Donald Trump more than they’ve ever hated anyone before.
Electing Donald Trump was merely the beginning. Remember the shock and horror of our intellectual and moral superiors. If we’re to do what needs to be done, we need to keep them in a constant state of shock and horror. And all that’s necessary to do that is to never stop fighting for American constitutionalism, the rule of law, and the safety of every American.
The alternative is more Garcia Zarates, helplessly and utterly without malice, holding guns that go off all by themselves, or cars that kill innocents, independent of their drunk, unlicensed, non-insured drivers, or members of some of the most vicious criminal gangs on the planet who go off on innocents, very much on purpose.
There is no nobility, no morality, no virtue in selling the lives of Americans for votes, in inventing rights for criminal aliens, in ignoring the rights of Americans. It’s time to make that unmistakably, irrevocably clear. It’s time to let the Left know we have not yet approached the limits of outrage–and the consequences.
“…must be made to fell, every day and in every way…”
I think that should read “feel”, lest a valiant SJW accuse you of some kind of nefarious coded message.
By the way, GREAT article!
Dear navyvet:
Thanks, and it–and two additional errors–are repaired. Always appreciate the catch; it’s damned hard to proofread oneself.
From another article: the only safe way to lower the hammer on a Sig is to use the decocking lever, per the owner’s manual, but the decocker was not LABELED. (How many languages would be necessary if it was labeled?) Also the defense noted negligent discharges with Sig products reported by police officers highly trained in the use of firearms, NYPD being one of the departments referenced, to infer a defective product design. It was also noted this pistol had a 4.4 pound pull in single action, which the defense claimed to be almost unheard of for a trigger to be this light and would be considered a hair trigger. There is a big advantage in having a jury (and possibly prosecutors) who know nothing about firearms.
Dear Occasional Thinker:
Decockers have always set my teeth on edge, which is why I’ve never been fond of that Sig feature, despite it working safely enough. And 4.4 pounds a hair trigger? Considering standard Glock triggers are 5.5 pounds, I think not. As you say, firearm illiteracy can work wonders, but one would hope prosecutors could point out killing people with a gun is a bit more serious than a minor, understandable accident. Apparently not in California.
Certainly the reaction from the conservatives on twitter immediately following the verdict showed a massive outrage. Of course, according to the liberal narrative, that was just “hate” being spewed by “Nazis” and “Russian bots”! I’m a card carrying member of those groups, ask any leftist, they’ll tell ya! 🙂
I’ve seen the same data quoted about the SIG, gitarcarver on This Ain’t Hell quoted it from The San Francisco Examiner. It’s not too hard to find references to the 320’s SA pull of ~4 lbs. The Examiner article also had this to impart:
Dear Casey Tompkins:
We must always be careful of report of negligent discharges. Virtually always,they are the fault of the shooter. The NYPD is always a poor example of anything firearm related. They require 12 pound triggers on their officer’s guns, which is a substitute for proper training, and demonstrates they mistrust their officers. I’ve written a number of articles about this particular issue, including one representative case where two officers legitimately shot and killed a murder suspect, but shot and wounded nine innocent bystanders in the process.
As to the “careless but not reckless” argument, one need not be the world’s best prosecutor to assert the mere fact that anyone was struck by a bullet is the very definition of recklessness. Careless handling results in holes in furniture, appliances or walls. Holes in people are reckless.
As you correctly note, we are badly hampered by being absent at that trial, but for safety’s sake, we must always maintain the highest gun handling standards, and absent unquestionable proof of a specific and repeatable mechanical fault, place the blame for negligent discharges where it lies: with the shooter.
And Zarate just happened to find the gun? Please.
Thank you for the mention of Jery Pournelle who recently passed away. As a school teacher, Mike might be aware of the fact that Mr Pournelle is the coauthor of THE MOTE IN GODS EYE and LUCIFERS HAMMER among other works. Pournelle’s military Science Fiction is well worth reading ashistory because it is inspired by history. General Bellasarius’ response to the Nika riots is particularly inspirational. News reports of liberal occupation events often inspire a desire to see a repeat ofthe action at the hippodrome.
This being said, I am not fan of the Sig but as much asI enjoy shooting a Glock I am to cowardly to carry one. The Sig has a decocking lever to return it to a condition where it fires in double action mode. However; many people neglect to ddcock before holstering or handling the weapon. I prefer the Third Generation Smith and Wesson semiautomatic pistols with a manual safety that not only decocks the pistol, but rotates the firing pin out of alignment with the cartridge and the hammer. Itis impossible to make a S&W pistol fire when the safety is on. For added security, these pistols have a magazine disconnect safety.
Blast it, I failed to close a bracket somewhere. :(
I hope the federal DOJ can pin something on Garcia.
There may be room for reasonable doubt as to intent, but guns are inanimate objects that cannot fire themselves. If Zarate did not intentionally shoot the victim, then he accidentally fired the weapon while carelessly handling it. Which means he is at least guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
Maybe the jurors were afraid that Obama would call them bitter clingers, and/or Clinton would call them deplorable, if they convicted the defendant of criminal homicide.
Or maybe they were afraid of reprisals from MS-13 or Antifa.
We need to give California back to Mexico. Then build the wall from Brownsville to San Diego, then extend it north to Canada.
“…There is no nobility, no morality, no virtue in selling the lives of Americans for votes, in inventing rights for criminal aliens, in ignoring the rights of Americans. It’s time to make that unmistakably, irrevocably clear. It’s time to let the Left know we have not yet approached the limits of outrage–and the consequences…”
But we’re getting close.
Great article, Mike. Looking forward to that “Jury system” article.
Also:
1. Doesn’t a judge issue option instructions to the jury? “Negligent” wasn’t mentioned?
2. I like Sigs (don’t have the 320). I like the decocking lever. You can drop it, kick it, throw it–it ain’t gonna AD! I always carry one in the chamber, naturally, no matter Sig, Glock, or my Kimber 1911. All are safe. Some revolvers, especially S&W ‘s, should not be dropped without a good life insurance policy.
3. When Governor Moonbeam (present or future) asks the federal government to bail out California when it goes full Stockton, what will our congressional kabuki players–including our Stupid Party cast members–say?
Dear Nonlocality:
1) Judges have wide latitude, and if they get it wrong, may be overturned, but that applies almost exclusively to guilty verdicts. As I mentioned, the prosecution gets one chance.
2) Yes.
3) When CA goes bankrupt, The Stupid Party will make clucking noises and raise a rhetorical ruckus, then fork over the bucks.