Tags
Aquaman, Batman, Clark Kent, Cyborg, DC, Joss Whedon, Justice League, Lois Lane, Marvel, Superman, The Flash, Wonder Woman
Director: Zack Snyder
Screenplay: Chris Terrio, Joss Whedon
Starring:
Batman: Ben Affleck
Superman: Henry Cavill
Wonder Woman: Gal Godot
Aquaman: Jason Momoa
Cyborg: Ray Fisher
The Flash: Ezra Miller
Alfred: Jeremy Irons
Lois Lane: Amy Adams
Martha Kent: Diane Lane
DC has, despite mighty efforts, lagged behind Marvel in successfully bringing its superheroes to the big screen. I must admit to some prejudice in that I always favored Marvel comics in my misspent youth. I did enjoy The Flash from time to time, but the rest didn’t capture my hyperactive imagination. After all, what can be done with Superman, an essentially omnipotent, immortal, invincible being? The struggles of his writers to construct plausible peril quickly wore thin, as did a perpetually kidnapped and screaming Lois Lane. Kryptonite? Please. Green Lantern? While I actually enjoyed his most recent movie debut (with a few caveats), I was barely aware he existed back then. And Wonder Woman? I never read the comics. I enjoyed Linda Carter, but always thought she was far too girly, and the special effects of the time were cheesier than Cheetos.
Man of Steel was widely panned, though I found it, if not a bit ponderous, entertaining, and enjoyed the introduction of Henry Cavill in the role. Batman v. Superman was universally panned (including by me). It reminded me of someone who, after decades of striving, finally got to make his movie, and threw in every idea he ever had because he knew he’d never get another chance. One can only imagine how long the finished product was before it was cut down to a mere 2.5 hours. And of course, there was Gal Godot’s debut as Wonder Woman in that film…
But first, let’s take a look at what critics are saying about Justice League, beginning with The Telegraph:
Yet there’s no trace of the stuff in Warner Bros’ latest hapless attempt to jump-start their DC Comics blockbuster brand, which at this point looks less like a cinematic universe than a pop-cultural black hole, sucking up as much money and audience goodwill as the studio can shovel into it.
After a four-film build-up that began four years ago with Man of Steel, Justice League should have felt like a culmination, with Batman and Wonder Woman recruiting new heroes and bringing back Superman in order to fend off an extraterrestrial invasion, in much the same way the Avengers did for Marvel five years ago.
Instead, it feels like a sheepish feature-length retraction of the franchise to date. It’s consistently embarrassing to watch, and features plot holes so yawningly vast they have a kind of Grand Canyon-like splendour: part of you wants to hang around to see what they look like at sunset.
I’m not ready to go nearly that far, particularly in light of this:
Its fundamental lopsidedness might come down at least in part to its unusually chaotic production. The rave reviews for Wonder Woman and pastings for Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad led to a series of frantic course-corrections mid-shoot, which were followed by the sudden departure of director Zack Snyder in unthinkably tragic circumstances, after his 20-year-old daughter committed suicide in March. (Both the remainder of the editing process and the substantial reshoots were supervised by Avengers director Joss Whedon, who receives a screenplay credit.)
Suicide Squad. The less said about that embarrassing thugfest, the better. Joss Whedon, perhaps best known for Firefly, Serenity and The Avengers–the best ensemble superhero movie yet made–likely rescued Justice League. Without him, Justice League might very well have been as bad as critics claim. Whedon’s trademark, genuine wit and humor enliven significant portions of the movie.
It’s difficult to provide any meaningful character development in an ensemble film, and there is little in Justice League, but the characters of Aquaman, the Flash, and to a lesser degree, Cyborg, are introduced, and there is enough backstory to make them interesting. The plot is predictable: an evil, ancient force, seized by an awakened god-like, evil brute–Steppenwolf–who was surely born to be wild, threatens to destroy the planet and everyone on it. Ben Affleck’s Batman must bring together Aquaman, Wonder Woman, Cyborg and The Flash to fight Steppenwolf, even though he knows they’re not enough to stop him and save the world. When everything looks darkest, Batman hatches a plan, using magic/technology/the power of the gods/the power of the universe/etc. to resurrect Superman, and together, they prevail.
There are holes in the plot galore, but that’s necessary to the genre. What woman wouldn’t recognize Clark Kent as Superman, or fail to realize Lois Lane was dating him? Who wouldn’t recognize mild mannered museum curator Diana Prince was Wonder Woman? How can Lois Lane fly with Superman at supersonic speeds without mussing her hair or having every shred of clothing ripped from her? At least in this movie Batman has regained his mental stability, transforming from a psychotic, single-minded killer into a rational techno-whiz and great detective/thinker. Sure, there are things that don’t make sense, but it’s a movie based on comic books. Anyone seeking the secret of existence, or insight into the nature of the universe, need seek elsewhere.
Henry Cavill is becoming more human, less conflicted. He is saved, as all good men are, by the love of a good woman, and there is, for the ladies, the obligatory scene of Superman, bare from the waist up, in all his pec-flexing glory.
Gal Godot is simply stunning. Not only is she utterly feminine, she’s an entirely credible, super powerful warrior. She has screen presence rarely seen in these days of actresses famous for being famous. She does it the old fashioned way: by looking great and acting well. An early fight scene featuring Godot is visually exciting and few will be able to resist delightedly rooting for her.
Ben Affleck’s Batman is settling more into the great detective of the comics, and leaving behind–thankfully–the angst ridden, self-doubting vigilante of past films. His self-designed and built technology helps him work credibly with his super powerful allies. Perhaps the most interesting plot device is what appears to be the beginnings of an attraction between Bruce Wayne and Diana Prince, and Batman’s realization that unlike the others, he could easily be killed. He has one of Whedon’s best lines. When the Flash asks about his super power, he sardonically replies “I’m rich.”
Ezra Miller’s The Flash is young, nerdy, and a little goofy, but his wide-eyed wonder at being involved with the rest, and with Bruce Wayne’s techno-goodies, is endearing. His character, while not quite reaching dynamic character levels, actually grows onscreen.
Jason Momoa plays a character he has all but perfected: the big, brutish, perpetually angry, shirtless loner (yes, he gets to do some pec flexing too). However, this time he manages, one supposes with the influence of Whedon, not to take himself too seriously, and even shows a bit of humor, particularly in one scene when he inadvertently sits on Wonder Woman’s lasso, and engages in a bit of unrestrained truth telling, to the delight of Godot and the audience.
It is Ray Fisher’s Cyborg that undergoes the least character development. Much of his role consists of grimacing at this and that, and interfacing with powerful, mystical, alien technology, which brings us to special effects.
That’s much of the point of superhero movies, and until the development of powerful CGI technology, these movies were impossible to realize. The look and feel of CGI in Justice League is up to contemporary standards, though it does not demonstrate any obvious breakthroughs. It is a good-looking movie–particularly when Godot is onscreen–and the fight scenes are generally thrilling without being confusing. Closeups of the face of Steppenwolf demonstrate the limitations of the art, however. Early attempts at depicting human facial closeups never worked. The eyes always looked lifeless, the expressions two-dimensional, the subtle interplay of facial muscles incorrect and flacid. Despite having non-human eyes, the same problem is apparent in Steppenwolf, though to a much lesser degree than in the past.
Justice League, of course, sets up multiple sequels. There are a great many heroes yet to be introduced, though if DC is wise, they’ll run with Godot, being careful not to produce movies just to produce movies. She can carry a great deal, but any actor falters with terrible dialogue and a non-existent plot.
Those that criticize Justice League for a scattered, inconsistent plot may be missing the point. We attend such movies not to experience the complex interplay of subtle emotions and the dawning insight brilliant dialogue and writing might provoke. We go to see great quests, enormous, cosmic backdrops, truly evil bad guys and truly noble good guys, the world, even existence hanging in the balance–and particularly good girls. We want titanic clashes between the forces of light and darkness, archetypical, mythic battles, and the eventual, if temporary, triumph of good. Sacrifice for the good of others is a powerful force, and many Amazons and others sacrifice that others might live. Diana Prince’s realization that Bruce Wayne is willing to risk his life for others is likewise touching.
By the plot standards of the genre, Justice League is unsurprising. It’s not The Avengers, but it contains elements that promise better is possible in the future. It’s not great art. When the history of cinema of this century is written, Justice League will not be in the top hundred, but it is an entertaining movie, and that’s why, mostly, we go to the theater.
And there might be just a touch of something worthwhile: we may leave the theater thinking some things are worth saving; some sacrifices are worth making.
It is worth seeing in the theater, if for no other reason than Godot and her expressive brown eyes, and the thrilling special effects. It helps, if like me, you enjoy movie popcorn. However, life will go on if one waits, and it is certainly worth owning on DVD.
Whedon is a schmuck and Affleck is a twerp, and allegations about their sexual misconduct may have triggered a boycott that will hurt the movie’s box office.
I was primarily a DC fan in the Silver Age. Marvel seemed a little pretentious and soap operish for my taste. Maybe if I had been a little older, I would have appreciated Marvel’s efforts to bring some depth to the medium. But, when I was old enough to appreciate the Marvel style, I was losing interest in comics in general, anyway.
Also, in the Bronze Age (1970s-1980s), DC was emulating Marvel, with more complex plots and characterization. By then, it was hard to tell a difference between the two companies, anyway.
The movie is not bad, but it is basically a paint-by-numbers superhero team origin story.
The Flash’s character seemed imitative of Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War. It is ironic that DC always seems to end up imitating Marvel now, since it was DC that basically created the superhero genre in the first place. And it was DC that revived the genre in the late 1950s, after it had been in a slump.
In fact, Marvel was mostly publishing science fiction anthology comics like Tales to Astonish and Strange Tales in the fifties. Pale imitations of EC comics like Weird Fantasy and Incredible Science Fiction. After Justice League proved to be a big hit, Marvel publisher Martin Goodman wanted something similar, so Stan Lee created the Fantastic Four and The Avengers.
BTW, the charter members of the Justice League in 1960 were the Flash, Green Lantern, Aquaman, Martian Manhunter, Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. Both the League and the Avengers went through personnel changes over the years, as some members left and new ones joined.
Cyborg was originally a member of the New Teen Titans in the late Bronze Age (early 1980s). I don’t know when or why he transferred to the League. Maybe the New 52 reboot retconned the team’s origin to make him a founding member. Or something.
Anyway, the movie is worth seeing just for Gal Gadot. How do you say “awesome” in Hebrew? She is so awesome, she has awesomeness that she has not even used yet.
You’re drawing a lot of conclusions from accusations. I hadn’t even heard of anything about Whedon, and honestly I think we’re seeing second & third order effects where women are now making claims about men who pissed them off. This is not to dismiss those who were actually harassed, but the number of accused men is growing unbelievably large.
That said, going by his work, Whedon is definitely not a schmuck. Firefly by itself is enough to guarantee his reputation, not to mention Buffy and all the derivatives, Serenity, and the first Avengers movie.
I’m glad you liked the movie, Mike; I’ve been planning on seeing it and was surprised by the panning it has received. One YouTube clip cited some reasons why it didn’t do as well as the Avengers, including the lack of prefacing stand-alone movies before JL was released. Another reason is Zack Snyder. As you say, we watch movies for entertainment, and his stuff is too dark and moody. Whedon has mastered the genre.
From the previews, JL looked a lot like an Avengers clone. As you said, a group of heroes has to learn to work together in order to save the planet from an alien invasion. I’ve already heard multiple remarks that Cyborg is a discount Iron Man, and as Tom has pointed out the character has been around for a while. A long time ago when I collected comics I picked up a copy of a Marvel/DC crossover featuring the X-Men and the Teen Titans, including Cyborg. Drawn by George Perez and inked by Terry Austin. Beautiful.
One aspect I find disturbing is the Marvel/DC fanbois slugging it out in comments sections across the intertubez. Then again, we are talking about the internet… :-/
I mostly collected Marvel myself, but we should be rooting for both universes to be successful. I would love to see a DC cinematic universe unfold.
It’s been a while since I watched Affleck in a movie I liked. Daredevil was not in my opinion that bad, although there is room for criticism. It’s good to hear he’s moved away from his Batman v. Superman persona, as I found that movie unpleasant in many ways. How It Should Have Ended (HISHE on YouTube) had a field day with that movie.
Anyway, Affleck looked good in the previews; he’s always been good with a quip and apparently Whedon fed him some great lines. It would be nice to see the World’s Greatest Detective on the big screen.
Mike, thanks for the review. Just have to make time to go see it myself now.
Have you seen, or do you plan to see the new Thor movie? It’s quite a bit of fun.
Dear Casey Tompkins:
I’m afraid my musical endeavors won’t let me see the Thor movie before it leaves theaters, but I’ll certainly review it on DVD. My favorite thus far is the first, directed by Kenneth Branaugh.
Mr. McDaniel,
FWIW, Thor: Ragnarok bears little resemblance to the first two Thor movies. In tone, it’s much more like the Guardians of the Galaxy movies, which I actually prefer. YMMV.
Dear Tom:
“Awesome” in Hebrew? Gal Godot.
Gal Gadot is a force of nature. One question, if you can recall. One reviewer said the first couple of scenes were taking shots at conservatives and Christians…remember seeing anything like that?
There is a brief scene during the opening montage where a white skinhead-type thug is being subdued by a cop, while some hijab-wearing women cower in the background. Presumably, the guy harassed or attacked the innocent Muslims. Also, when WW rescues hostages at the beginning, she uses the magic lasso to make a terrorist confess, and he refers to his group as “reactionary,” so maybe they are supposed to be right-wing.
I’m still waiting for Hollywood to do something (maybe an episode of Law & Order or CSI) where a maniac pledges allegiance to ISIS before going on a shooting spree, or an unvetted immigrant runs over a crowd of pedestrians with a truck, or where a hate crime against Muslim immigrants or black college students turns out to be a hoax. But I am not holding my breath.
Dear Tom:
I noticed the Muslim woman being attacked by thugs, but didn’t think it an egregious political statement. I doubt most movie goers would.
I am boycotting movies to protest the politically correct activism. The hypocrisy regarding sexual harassment and sexual assaults only strengthens my resolve. Linda Carter will always be Wonder Woman to me but I might have been persuaded to see Justice League if Gul Gadot were naked.
Naked or not, Gal Godot is extremely easy to look at.
So is Linda Carter and she did reveal her “weapons of mass distraction” in a few movies.
Aquaman SAT on Wonder Woman’s magic lasso? Which portion of his anatomy was telling the truth.
Pingback: Aquaman (2018) | Stately McDaniel Manor