Screen Shot 2016-02-11 at 14.57.12Global warming/climate change is one of history’s great, and most expensive, scams, and an issue of great importance in this election, yet it has been, for the most part, ignored. Even the U.N. has admitted if it got every penny it demanded and every nation rigorously followed its supposedly scientific prescription for “fixing” the climate, it might–might–reduce the global temperature by less than a single degree in a century. The computer climate models have proved to be, almost without exception, wrong, and those that appear to be correct are almost always due to manipulating data or otherwise cheating. “Climate scientists” refuse to provide their data sets and methodology for replication by other scientists, or “lose” them. They also try to destroy the careers of those that disagree with them, and sympathetic politicians want to jail “climate deniers” or even kill them. The climate change crowd claims “consensus,” as if a majority holding an opinion in science settles the issue. This is not exactly a brilliant advertisement for the glory of science.

They’ve had to adopt the term “climate change” instead of “global warming,”because the global has stopped warming and they’re very embarrassed, according to their e-mails, they can’t explain that away. Climate change is actually a grotesque wealth redistribution scheme, sending America’s money–money we don’t have–to third world dictatorships, and to friends of progressive politicians, who, in ventures like Solyndra, enrich themselves and flush the rest down the closest environmentally friendly toilet.

credit: thenewrepublic

credit: thenewrepublic

In the last debate, Hillary Clinton said climate change was a very serious issue. There can be no doubt if elected, she will continue to degrade America’s energy industry, while simultaneously wasting billions on climate change scams.

There are two possibilities: Clinton actually believes climate change pseudo-science, or she knows it to be a scam and will continue to add it to her bulging criminal portfolio, except as president, she’ll be able to send far more money to her cronies, domestic and international. She’ll also be in a much better position to extract pay for play funds for the Clinton Foundation. The FBI and DOJ have already proved they’ll do nothing to stop any Clintonian criminal acts, and the Clintons will be swift to take advantage of that situation.

Either possibility for Clinton, Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry is disturbing in the extreme. Either they are complete idiots, or they are criminals. In either case, they have control of the assets of the American people and are more than willing to waste them.

Generally ignored in all of this, particularly by climate change true believers is whether we possess the capability to actually do anything about the Climate. We don’t. We have no means to affect the climate, which we can neither predict, nor control. This doesn’t mean we should pollute without reservation, but a bit of humility would be helpful and would free up hundreds of billions for those infrastructure programs progressives are always promising to fund. And speaking of a total lack of humility, consider this July 22, 2016 story from the Free Beacon: 



Secretary of State John Kerry said in Vienna on Friday that air conditioners and refrigerators are as big of a threat to life as the threat of terrorism posed by groups like the Islamic State.

The Washington Examiner reported that Kerry was in Vienna to amend the 1987 Montreal Protocol that would phase out hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs, from basic household and commercial appliances like air conditioners, refrigerators, and inhalers.

‘As we were working together on the challenge of [ISIS] and terrorism,’ Kerry said. ‘It’s hard for some people to grasp it, but what we–you–are doing here right now is of equal importance because it has the ability to literally save life on the planet itself.

Of course. Terrorists will murder you and your loved ones in the most gruesome manner possible and return the world to an age of darkness and barbarism, but global warming might raise the global temperature a degree or two, maybe, someday, which would lengthen crop growing seasons, produce far more food, and prevent the deaths of thousands from extreme cold. That, to the climate change crowd, would be bad, worse than Islamist terror, because Islamist terror is not, for the most part, putting any money or political power in their pockets.

But poor Secretary Kerry is, like Mr. Obama, and surely, Mrs. Clinton, so very disappointed in us, and in our lack of recognition of what really, truly matters, as PJ Media reports: 



Secretary of State John Kerry admitted ‘it pisses me off’ that climate change wasn’t brought up in the presidential debates.

On a panel with Leonardo DiCaprio after a Thursday screening at UN headquarters in New York of the actor’s documentary ‘Before the Flood,’ Kerry said that ‘maybe November 8th will produce a capacity for the entire Republican caucus’ to see the global-warming film.

‘It should be required for every single one of them,’ he added, to applause from the audience.

Required. Really Mr. Kerry? And will they be “required” to believe what you want them to believe, and to do what you want, when it comes time to shell out the bucks?

Kerry emphasized ‘we’re not sitting here chasing some pie-in-the-sky set of possible solutions somewhere down the road.

The solutions are here now. Every single one of them is staring us in the face. We know what we have to do. The solution to climate change is energy policy. And if we will make the right choices and everybody here exponentially grown around the planet starts to push the politicians, as the film said, then they won’t dare be against it as the populations begin to demand different sources of electricity, different sources of — of transportation, and so forth,’ he said.

We know that to do about climate change!? We have all the solutions, “every single one of them!?” Wow. Who knew? Why haven’t the warming scientists published those amazing breakthroughs in legitimate journals?

Kerry argued that climate-change activists “will be able to win the battle of sending a message to people about how we account for the true costs, about what our opportunities are for a new energy base for our nation, how we will be able to do transportation and meet all of our obligations.

Oh. We don’t have all the solutions? We’re still at the “sending a message” stage? But he suggests we have an entirely new energy base, no doubt like the Tonopah Solar Plant in Nevada, infamous for failing to produce anything close to the amount of electricity its proponents claimed, and equally infamous for blinding pilots, and quick frying millions of birds. Or perhaps Kerry is referring to the wind farms whose huge blades serve as avian food processors, slicing and dicing millions of birds on the wing, including protected species which environmentalists immediately stop caring about when they’re killed by wind turbines. And we will be able to “do transportation,” perhaps like Mrs. Clinton “did” the Americans at Benghazi? The obligations about which he speaks are the checks we’re distributing to greenie cronies and corrupt regimes around the world. We certainly can’t neglect those obligations. What’s that you say? What about our veterans dying because they can’t get appointments to see a VA doctor? What are you, some kind of Mother Earth hater? We have to have priorities.

The secretary of State lamented that ‘not one single question was asked of any candidate on the subject of climate change’ during the three presidential debates and vice presidential debate.

‘Didn’t that piss you off while you were watching?’ DiCaprio asked.

‘Yeah. Totally. Totally. It pisses me off tonight, too,’ Kerry replied.

And we have to listen to DiCaprio. He’s an actor that has starred in some movies, and flown around the world in private jets to hector others about sacrificing to save the planet, so he knows about this sort of stuff.

On November 8, we have a very clear choice, as illustrated by this excerpt from the Trump website:“5.) Lift restrictions on the production of 50 trillion dollars worth of job producing American energy reserves including shale oil, natural gas and clean coal.

6.) Lift Obama-Clinton roadblocks that prohibit vital energy infrastructure programs like the Keystone Pipeline.

7.) Cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use that money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure.

It’s that, or four–and likely eight–more years of the Obama- Kerry-Clinton wealth redistribution and America destruction program. And hey, John Kerry, who owns a private yacht and more palatial homes than most of us can imagine, is pissed! Image how pissed Hillary Clinton is going to be when we disappoint her.