Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 6.50.54 PMThis week, I’m pleased to see that my favorite Bookworm took home the honors. Pssst: I voted for her. If you’re not reading Bookworm Room on a daily basis, you’re missing much.  By all means, scroll down to find some of the finest writing on the Internet.

This week’s winning essay, Bookworm Room’s Because government is a force multiplier for evil, a vote for the small government candidate is a vote for good is her look at the virtues of limited government. Here’s a slice:

I was struggling to explain to a Bernie supporter why his “compassionate” politics will not stop the risks to Americans from further socializing and therefore growing American government. In military terminology, a force multiplier is a single capability that, when added to an enterprise, dramatically increases the effect.

The problem with government is that, as it grows, no matter the original good intentions behind it, it invariably becomes a force multiplier for evil. Thus, once government power passes a certain point, government becomes the equivalent of a bull in a china shop, with its every motion causing massive damage. Incidentally, the china in that shop is always you — the individual.

I defy any one of you reading this to identify a huge government that has not eventually done great damage to its citizens. This is true whether the government was an imperial monarchy (Rome or China), a theocracy (Iran), a military dictatorship (every tin pot tyrant in Latin America), a socialist government (Greece), a communist government (USSR or China), or a demagogic cult of personality (a la, say, Mugabe in Zimbabwe).

Individuals can be stupid and even unbelievably cruel. Every day the media is filled with stories from around the world of people killing or harming each other, whether through carelessness or deliberate action. Reading these stories, we may long for a strong hand from above to create order. If you’re an environmentalist, you want government to beat down the polluters and the deniers. If you’re devoutly religious, you want leadership that stops blasphemy, premarital sex, abortion, and pornography. If you’re a feminist, you want to bring to heel men who demean women. People with strong ideals believe that they are being good when they seek an equally strong government that will enforce those beliefs.

There’s actually nothing wrong with voters within a small community enacting regulations that allow government to enforce their beliefs. Small governments are close to and responsive to the voters, making them ideal laboratories of democracy. For example, Colorado is a perfect test case for marijuana legalization. Local voters asked for it, it’s being implemented, and an interested America can see whether legalizing pot is a good thing or a bad thing. Because the experiment’s scale is finite, the ensuing damage is limited, those who hate the law’s effects can move elsewhere without leaving their country, and a local law is more easily reversed than something enacted and enforced at a national level.

Likewise, if California voters elect legislators who think that green cars will save the world, and therefore give enormous subsidies to rich people for buying electric cars at a discount . . . well, go for it. Smart, wealthy Californians will buy the subsidized car and then head for a low-tax state. Those who can’t afford the cars and resent the subsidies can also move. Meanwhile, the rest of America can marvel at a state with the highest poverty rate in America that subsidizes rich people’s toys.

When things happen at a national level, where governments are increasingly removed from their representatives (not to mention entirely removed from ideologically-driven Supreme Court justices) they rapidly become anti-democratic. This is most obvious when it comes to money because anything that involves the federal government involves money — incredibly vast sums of money. Where there’s money, there’s corruption. That’s how it came about that, during a painful recession, taxpayers across America find themselves funding Solyndra and related entities — not because doing so was good business, but because the government put its thumb on the scale. When those companies failed, there was nowhere for ripped-off Americans to go, short of emigrating.

More at the link.

In our non-Council category, the winner was Garry Kasparov in the Daily Beast with submitted by Bookworm Room. Chess champion Kasparov has a few things to say here to Bernie Sanders about socialism, having experienced it first hand….

Here are this week’s full results:

Council Winners:

*First place with 3 votes!Bookworm RoomBecause government is a force multiplier for evil, a vote for the small government candidate is a vote for good

Second place with 2 2/3 votes Puma By DesignNYPD Morale at Historic Low under Bill de Blasio

Third place with 2 votes Stately McDaniel ManorThe Obama CIA: Spying From Behind

Fourth place with 1 1/3 votes The Daley GatorTwo words for those offended, butt hurt, or aggrieved by the views expressed by me on this humble blog

Fourth place with 1 1/3 votes The Noisy RoomAmerican Spring – Bread And Circuses

Fifth place with 1 vote The Right PlanetSargon of Akkad on the Regressive Left

Fifth place with 1 vote GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnDThe Collapse Of Red China

Sixth place with 1/3 vote The Glittering EyeEverything I Needed to Know About the Trump Campaign…

Sixth place with 1/3 vote Nice Deb Michelle Fields Doubles Down: Breitbart Knew the Truth From The Very Beginning

Non-Council Winners:

First place with 3 1/3 votes!Garry Kasparov/The Daily BeastGarry Kasparov: Hey, Bernie, Don’t Lecture Me About Socialism. I Lived Through It. Submitted by Bookworm Room

Second place with 3 votes Caroline Glick The subversion of American Evangelicals Submitted by The Noisy Room

Third place with 1 2/3 votes John C. Kluge/NY PostWhy I support Trump — and resent the elites trying to destroy him Submitted by Joshuapundit

Fourth place with 1 vote Jeff Greenfield/Politico What’s Wrong With Hillary? Submitted by The Glittering Eye

Fourth place with 1 vote Bearing ArmsTrump’s Primary victories a Yuge Blow To The Second Amendment Submitted by Stately McDaniel Manor

Fourth place with 2/3 votesStella Morabito/The FederalistSocialism’s Bloody History Shows Millennials Should Think Twice Before Supporting It  Submitted by Puma By Design

Fourth place with 2/3 votesKori Schake/The AtlanticObama: Fighting Wars He Believes Unwinnable Submitted by GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD

Fourth place with 2/3 votesBen Shapiro/The Daily Wire Donald Trump Is A Liar Submitted by Nice Deb

Fourth place with 2/3 votesTyler Durden/Zero Hedge The Coming Collapse Of Saudi Arabia Submitted by The Watcher

Fifth place with 1/3 voteThe Rationalists The Ideological Lens Submitted by The Right Planet

Fifth place with 1/3 voteRoger L. Simon/PJ Media GOP Should Use Trump, Not Abuse Trump Submitted by The Watcher

See you next week!

Make sure to tune in every Monday for the Watcher’s Forum. and every  Tuesday morning, when we reveal the weeks’ nominees for Weasel of the Week!

And remember, every Wednesday, the Council has its weekly contest with the members nominating two posts each, one written by themselves and one written by someone from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council. The votes are cast by the Council, and the results are posted on Friday morning.

It’s a weekly magazine of some of the best stuff written in the blogosphere, and you won’t want to miss it...or any of the other fantabulous Watcher’s Council content.

The Watcher’s Council can also be followed on Facebook and Twitter.  Please, gentle readers, return each Friday, same bat-time, same bat channel, for the results of each week’s voting.