Tags
In “Our Muslim/Christian President,” I explained Barack Obama’s background:
There is no question that Mr. Obama was born to a Muslim father. It is not only a matter of record, but Mr. Obama has admitted it in writing and in multiple interviews and speeches. In addition, despite progressives–and some Muslims–crying discrimination and racism when Mr. Obama’s middle name is mentioned, he has often traded on that name–and his self-confessed affinity for Islam–when he has considered it advantageous. The fact remains that only Muslim children are named “Hussein.” He was Mohammed’s grandson and is revered in Islam as a holy martyr. On his school enrollment forms in Indonesia, the young Obama was recorded as a Muslim. This is unsurprising as the children of a Muslim father are themselves Muslims; it is not a matter of choice, nor may one choose to leave Islam. Those who do become apostates and Islam dictates but one fate for apostates: death. That most Muslims would not try to kill an apostate speaks well of their individual character, but millions would, which speaks to the dictates of their faith and their willingness to follow it to the letter.
I also analyzed Mr. Obama’s claim to Christianity:
What kind of Christianity does Mr. Obama profess to follow? The Rev. Wright is one of America’s foremost proponents of Black Liberation Theology. It is essentially a political philosophy– a black racist movement steeped in Marxist orthodoxy–wrapped in religious trappings.
There is no question that Mr. Obama is a Muslim. To what degree he recognizes the influence of any religion and to what degree that motivates him is the ultimate question. However, F.W. Burleigh, writing in The American Thinker, points out what would seem to be indisputable evidence of Mr. Obama’s Muslim belief as illustrated by the photograph that leads this article.
What appears to some to be a mere pointed finger is actually the shahada, the Muslim affirmation of faith. That he was making that very specific sign at a meeting of the US-African Leaders Conference in Washington D.C. in August of 2014 provides the context that makes his gesture unmistakable—and chilling. By all means, read Burleigh’s article for background.
We are left with a number of extraordinarily disturbing and dangerous conclusions, though these are they only possible explanations:
*Barack Obama is a stealth Muslim and has been working against the interests of religious pluralism, the United States and of civilization since the first day of his term in office. In effect, every day he is in office, he commits treason.
*Barack Obama is a Christian steeped in black liberation theology. He is a not-very-stealthy racist and always has been.
*Barack Obama is a Muslim who winks at the world’s Muslims. He believes he is fooling us, but jihadists know his faith and beliefs, and he and they are playing us for fools. They know his profession of Christian faith is a lie, and Muslims are encouraged to lie to infidels.
*Barack Obama recognizes no being greater than himself, therefore he is psychologically incapable of humbling himself before any god. All of his professions of faith, including the shahada, are merely cynical manipulations he deems useful and may be affirmed or rejected at any moment. Barack Obama is whatever serves Barack Obama best at any given moment.
It is horrifying that even these four possibilities are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Even if Mr. Obama is not in the least Muslim, his actions have consistently and unquestionably been beneficial to jihad and harmful to Americ and her allies. But what about his drone strikes? They are nothing more than ecessary and limited gestures to placate an easily fooled public and a willingly fooled media. By killing high value Muslim terrorists, America is denied the intelligence they possess that could really damage the jihad. Each top terrorist killed by a Hellfire missile is quickly and easily replaced, and the world wide jihad has dramatically expanded, not withered, under Mr. Obama’s leadership from behind.
Mr. Obama’s racist credentials are constantly on display, and his narcissism—extraordinary even for politicians—is the stuff of deranged legend. Consider this from his primary advisor, Valerie Jarrett:
I think Barack knew that he had God-given talents that were extraordinary. He knows exactly how smart he is. … He knows how perceptive he is. He knows what a good reader of people he is. And he knows that he has the ability — the extraordinary, uncanny ability — to take a thousand different perspectives, digest them and make sense out of them, and I think that he has never really been challenged intellectually. … So, what I sensed in him was not just a restless spirit but somebody with such extraordinary talents that had to be really taxed in order for him to be happy. … He’s been bored to death his whole life. He’s just too talented to do what ordinary people do.
Imagine being surrounded by people, day in and day out, who not only think this way, but praise you in pseudo-religious terms.
In dealing with this question, all that is truly necessary is to consider the answer to a single question: Would a President of the United States true to the Constitution, true to the ethic of western civilization, dedicated to the protection of the American people and to the salvation of liberty, allow Iran—run by fanatics determined to bring about the apocalypse–to have nuclear weapons under any circumstance?
By every indication, not the least of which is Mr. Obama’s irrational–it would be irrational for any president actually representing America–rage at the idea of Benjamin Netanyahu arguing before Congress that Iran must never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons, Barack Obama is entirely comfortable with Iranian nucs. Even Democrats are saying Mr. Obama’s pronouncements are talking points “coming out of Tehran.” Iran’s enemies are Obama’s enemies. Only American political realities prevent him from more actively warring on Israel. We can, if we choose, utterly defeat Iran and destroy every trace of its nuclear program, but Barack Obama chooses to war against Israel and prevent the Israelis from warring against Iran.
Everything Barack Obama says has an expiration date, every promise may be a lie as soon as it’s uttered. Every red line drawn is retracted or totally withdrawn as soon as an evil malefactor crosses it, every deadline is reset as soon as it expires. Mr. Obama’s oft-stated resolve to deny nuclear weapons to Iran has long been expired, all that remains is his admission that it was a lie all along.
When the Iranians get nuclear weapons, they will use them, first against Israel, then against us, perhaps simultaneously. Then will we see, in ways not easily ignored or explained away, the result of Barack Obama’s beliefs, or lack thereof. I wonder if even that would move the milquetoast demagogues of Congress to impeach him?
” Each top terrorist killed by a Hellfire missile is quickly and easily replaced, and the world wide jihad has dramatically expanded, not withered, under Mr. Obama’s leadership from behind.”
Here is a chilling thought. Each of these small terrorist groups can be considered a gang. Call them Gang A with Leader A through to Gang E with Leader E. Each gang has 100 followers. Each can be relatively easily to deal with because of low numbers. Each with its own agenda.
Kill off Gang Leaders A through D. Gang Leader E is the only one left standing. Each gang picks a new leader Gang Leader E. Now, you have one gang of 500 which is harder to deal with.
“Imagine being surrounded by people, day in and day out, who not only think this way, but praise you in pseudo-religious terms.” Narcissists tend to surround themselves with yes-men. They cannot “take different perspectives and digest them,” because they cannot consider the validity of any opinion other than their own. Obama has been compared to FDR and JFK, but his “my way or no way” attitude is more similar to Adolf Hitler.
And, like most limousine liberals, Obama “recognizes no being greater than himself.” His various professions of faith (whether it’s the shahada, or attending Wright’s church) are “cynical manipulations” which may be “affirmed or rejected at any moment.” And many of his supporters understand it, and condone it.
If you point out that Obama frequently contradicts himself, his fans will say, “He had to say X to get the Progressive votes, he had to say Y to appease the Christians, and he had to lie about Z to fool the centrists into voting for him.”
When you are fifteen, lying and cynical manipulation seem terribly sophisticated. And, when you are fifteen, being cool and sophisticated are important qualities (much more important than quaint concepts like honesty and integrity). And, emotionally and intellectually, Obama’s supporters are about fifteen years old.
It is quite natural for a creature like Barrack Obama to see the similarities between his own religious ideology and one of the two dominant political ideologies in America. It’s a very short jump from one to the other and jumping to a political ideology in this country gives one substantial chance of gaining in power and income. Ideologies have served manipulators down through the ages – they require only a complete lack of humility, self restraint and conscience. Ideologies feed the ego like nothing else can. And that’s why they’re so compelling and attractive – and dangerous.
Ideologies are created and followed (proudly, no less) by every mental-age 15 year old here and throughout the world. We (also predictably) just voted for another ideologue manipulator. We’ll vote for another one in the next election. We’ve actually had two double-term ideologue manipulators in a row and that’s why we’re drifting so close to the edge of the falls.
I believe he is a Muslim. Search the word taquiya (sp) and you will see that he is not violating his faith at all.
“and I think that he has never really been challenged intellectually. …” Ms Jarrett is not off in her assessment. In terms of the number of people at given levels of IQ & apptitude, it is true that “even” someone possessing an I
Should have continued: “even” someone possessing an IQ of 120 has fewer than 1 in 5 real peers. At IQ 130, the ratio climbs steeply and, typically, not 1 in 100 have that level of intellectual ability. THEREFORE: Obama quite likely has never met his intellectual equal or better. That can be highly misleading to someone who also has an ego the size of Barrack Obama’s. I laugh when I remember it was Hitler who said: “I am the greatest military strategist of all time!!” Hah! That was AT THE BEGINNING OF WWII. Hitler’s generals all knew he was self deluding and that he was nowhere near being “greatest” or even “great.”
I went to school with others who had IQs in the 125 to 160 range. I live in a university town where, at parties, professors routinely hold forth to show how smart they are. Obama isn’t as smart as he believes himself to be – maybe about as smart as those self-presuming professors but no more. But like Hitler, it’s not Obama’s genius we should fear – it’s his stupidity while committing blunders.
Pingback: Barack Obama And Easter: He’s Very Disappointed In Christianity | Stately McDaniel Manor
Pingback: Barack Obama: Defender Of The One, True Faith | Stately McDaniel Manor
Pingback: Russia-Hacking; Obama-Muslim | Stately McDaniel Manor
Pingback: The Justine Damond Case, #6: Transforming Policing, Demonstrating Allegiance | Stately McDaniel Manor
Pingback: The Strangeness Of Politician Worship | Stately McDaniel Manor
Pingback: The Iran Deal And Barack Obama: Ooops! | Stately McDaniel Manor
Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
This is the PROBLEM. Democrats are still on this band wagon.
kommonsentsjane
Dear commonsentsjane:
Thanks for the reblog!
Pingback: KOMMONSENTSJANE – Barack Obama: Stealth Muslim? By: Stately McDaniel Manor | kommonsentsjane
Dear commonsentsjane:
Thanks for the reblog!
Reblogged this on The way I see things ….
Dear Lisa the Infidel:
Thanks for the reblog and welcome to SMM!